Winther A M, Muren J E, Lundquist C T, Osborne R H, Nässel D R
Department of Zoology, Stockholm University, Sweden.
Peptides. 1998;19(3):445-58. doi: 10.1016/s0196-9781(97)00463-4.
The nine Leucophaea Tachykinin-Related Peptides (LemTRP 1-9) isolated from the midgut and brain of the cockroach, Leucophaea maderae, all induced increases in spontaneous contractions of the L. maderae hindgut. Synthetic LemTRP 1 and 3-9, were equally potent in inducing contractions of the hindgut. More than seven of the nine C-terminal residues of the closely related locust peptide locustatachykinin I (LomTK I) are required for full activity of the peptide on the L. maderae hindgut. Proctolin, a well characterized myostimulatory neuropeptide, was shown to be more potent than LemTRPs. LemTRP 1 and proctolin did not have synergistic actions in potentiating the amplitude and tonus of contractions of the L. maderae hindgut. Several differences could be seen in actions of LemTRP 1 and proctolin. In contrast to proctolin, LemTRP 1 could not override the inhibitory action of 10(-9) M of the myoinhibitory peptide leucomyosuppressin. Spantide I, an antagonist of the mammalian tachykinin receptors, at a concentration of 5 microM, blocked the response to LemTRP 1, but not to proctolin. The competitive proctolin receptor antagonist [alpha-methyl-L-tyrosine2]-proctolin blocked the action of both proctolin and LemTRP 1 when applied at 1 microM, whereas cycloproctolin had no antagonist action on either peptide. Verapamil, a blocker of voltage gated Ca2+-channels, and the less specific Ca2+-channel blocker Mn2+, abolished the action of LemTRP 1, but not of proctolin. The results obtained indicate that LemTRPs act on receptors distinct from those of proctolin. Double label immunocytochemistry revealed that all LomTK-like immunoreactive fibers impinge on the proctolinergic fibers in the hindgut. This finding and the inhibitory actions of Ca2+-channel blockers on TRP responses and of the proctolin receptor antagonist on both peptides, may suggest that the LemTRP receptors are not on the hindgut muscle fibers but on the terminals of the proctolinergic neurons. Thus, LemTRPs may induce release of proctolin on the hindgut. An alternative is that LemTRPs act by mechanisms clearly distinct from those of proctolin.
从蜚蠊(Leucophaea maderae)中肠和脑中分离出的九种与速激肽相关的肽(LemTRP 1 - 9)均能引起蜚蠊后肠自发收缩增强。合成的LemTRP 1以及3 - 9在诱导后肠收缩方面具有同等效力。与蝗虫肽蝗虫速激肽I(LomTK I)密切相关的九种肽中,超过七个C末端残基对于该肽在蜚蠊后肠上发挥完全活性是必需的。促肠动素(Proctolin)是一种特性明确的肌肉刺激神经肽,其效力比LemTRPs更强。LemTRP 1和促肠动素在增强蜚蠊后肠收缩幅度和张力方面没有协同作用。在LemTRP 1和促肠动素的作用上可以看到一些差异。与促肠动素不同,LemTRP 1无法克服10⁻⁹ M的肌抑制肽亮肌抑制素的抑制作用。5 μM浓度的哺乳动物速激肽受体拮抗剂Spantide I可阻断对LemTRP 1的反应,但对促肠动素无此作用。竞争性促肠动素受体拮抗剂[α - 甲基 - L - 酪氨酸²] - 促肠动素在1 μM浓度时可阻断促肠动素和LemTRP 1的作用,而环促肠动素对这两种肽均无拮抗作用。电压门控Ca²⁺通道阻滞剂维拉帕米以及特异性较低的Ca²⁺通道阻滞剂Mn²⁺可消除LemTRP 1的作用,但对促肠动素无此作用。所得结果表明,LemTRPs作用于与促肠动素不同的受体。双重标记免疫细胞化学显示,所有LomTK样免疫反应性纤维都与后肠中的促肠动素能纤维相接触。这一发现以及Ca²⁺通道阻滞剂对TRP反应的抑制作用和促肠动素受体拮抗剂对两种肽的作用,可能表明LemTRP受体不在后肠肌肉纤维上,而是在促肠动素能神经元的终末上。因此,LemTRPs可能在后肠上诱导促肠动素的释放。另一种可能性是,LemTRPs的作用机制与促肠动素明显不同。