Suppr超能文献

在常规治疗条件下,新型微晶双香豆素制剂与华法林的比较。

Comparison of a new microcrystalline dicoumarol preparation with warfarin under routine treatment conditions.

作者信息

Lockner D, Paul C

出版信息

Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1979 Jul;8(1):59-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1979.tb05910.x.

Abstract

1 To determine whether two different oral anticoagulants show difference under routine clinical conditions, 71 patients were randomized to treatment with Apekumarol, a microcrystalline dicoumarol preparation, and 72 patients to treatment with warfarin. 2 During the inpatient phase of treatment both drug groups remained for about 94% of their treatment time within prothrombin value limits of 5-25% (Simplastin A). No statistically significant difference was found between the drugs. 3 While under outpatient care, both drug groups remained for about 80% of their treatment time within prothrombin value limits of 5-25%. No statistically significant difference was found between the drugs. 4 The intensity of control and number of prothrombin-determinations did not differ significantly between the groups. 5 Variations in the daily dose did not differ significantly between the groups. 6 The mean daily dose could not be correlated to mean body weight. 7 The mean daily dose decreased with age for the male patients taking warfarin, not for the female patients. There was no such decrease for either male or female patients taking Apekumarol. An additional 137 patients who at the time of the trial were under routine treatment with warfarin were also studied with regard to mean daily dose, age and sex. In this additional group the mean daily dose could be correlated with age in both males and females. 8 No difference between Apekumarol and warfarin could be demonstrated when tested under routine clinical conditions according to the design of the present study. Sensitivity for warfarin, but not for Apekumarol, seems to increase with age, this sensitivity has been demonstrated in both sexes.

摘要
  1. 为了确定两种不同的口服抗凝剂在常规临床条件下是否存在差异,71例患者被随机分配接受微晶双香豆素制剂阿哌香豆醇治疗,72例患者接受华法林治疗。2. 在住院治疗阶段,两个药物组在凝血酶原值5 - 25%(单步凝血酶原时间试剂A)范围内的治疗时间约占其总治疗时间的94%。未发现两种药物之间存在统计学上的显著差异。3. 在门诊治疗期间,两个药物组在凝血酶原值5 - 25%范围内的治疗时间约占其总治疗时间的80%。未发现两种药物之间存在统计学上的显著差异。4. 两组之间的控制强度和凝血酶原测定次数没有显著差异。5. 两组之间每日剂量的变化没有显著差异。6. 平均每日剂量与平均体重之间没有相关性。7. 服用华法林的男性患者平均每日剂量随年龄下降,女性患者则不然。服用阿哌香豆醇的男性或女性患者均未出现这种下降情况。另外137例在试验时正在接受华法林常规治疗的患者也对平均每日剂量、年龄和性别进行了研究。在这个额外的组中,男性和女性的平均每日剂量都与年龄相关。8. 根据本研究的设计,在常规临床条件下进行测试时,未发现阿哌香豆醇和华法林之间存在差异。华法林的敏感性似乎随年龄增加而增加,阿哌香豆醇则不然,这种敏感性在两性中均已得到证实。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验