• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

国家健康结果量表(HoNOS)。研究与开发。

Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS). Research and development.

作者信息

Wing J K, Beevor A S, Curtis R H, Park S B, Hadden S, Burns A

机构信息

College Research Unit, University of Nottingham.

出版信息

Br J Psychiatry. 1998 Jan;172:11-8. doi: 10.1192/bjp.172.1.11.

DOI:10.1192/bjp.172.1.11
PMID:9534825
Abstract

BACKGROUND

An instrument was required to quantify and thus potentially measure progress towards a Health of the Nation target, set by the Department of Health, "to improve significantly the health and social functioning of mentally ill people".

METHOD

A first draft was created in consultation with experts and on the basis of literature review. This version was improved during four stages of testing: two preliminary stages, a large field trial involving 2706 patients (rated by 492 clinicians) and tests of the final Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS), which included an independent study (n = 197) of reliability and relationship to other instruments.

RESULTS

The resulting 12-item instrument is simple to use, covers clinical problems and social functioning with reasonable adequacy, has been generally acceptable to clinicians who have used it, is sensitive to change or the lack of it, showed good reliability in independent trials and compared reasonably well with equivalent items in the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scales and Role Functioning Scales.

CONCLUSIONS

The key test for HoNOS is that clinicians should want to use it for their own purposes. In general, it has passed that test. A further possibility, that HoNOS data collected routinely as part of a minimum data set, for example for the Care Programme Approach, could also be useful in anonymized and aggregated form for public health purposes, is therefore testable but has not yet been tested.

摘要

背景

需要一种工具来量化,从而有可能衡量朝着卫生部设定的“显著改善精神病患者的健康状况和社会功能”这一国家健康目标所取得的进展。

方法

在与专家协商并基于文献综述的基础上创建了初稿。该版本在四个测试阶段得到改进:两个初步阶段、一项涉及2706名患者(由492名临床医生评定)的大型现场试验以及最终的国家健康结果量表(HoNOS)测试,其中包括一项关于可靠性以及与其他工具关系的独立研究(n = 197)。

结果

最终形成的包含12个条目的工具使用简便,对临床问题和社会功能的涵盖较为充分,已使用该工具的临床医生普遍接受,对变化或缺乏变化敏感,在独立试验中显示出良好的可靠性,并且与简明精神病评定量表和角色功能量表中的等效条目相比表现相当不错。

结论

HoNOS的关键测试在于临床医生是否愿意为自身目的使用它。总体而言,它通过了该测试。另一种可能性是,作为最小数据集的一部分常规收集的HoNOS数据,例如用于护理计划方法的数据,以匿名和汇总的形式用于公共卫生目的也可能有用,因此这是可测试的,但尚未进行测试。

相似文献

1
Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS). Research and development.国家健康结果量表(HoNOS)。研究与开发。
Br J Psychiatry. 1998 Jan;172:11-8. doi: 10.1192/bjp.172.1.11.
2
The structure and reliability of the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales.《国民健康结果量表》的结构与可靠性
Australas Psychiatry. 2015 Feb;23(1):66-8. doi: 10.1177/1039856214563851. Epub 2014 Dec 17.
3
Health of the Nation Outcome Scales for People with Learning Disabilities (HoNOS-LD).学习障碍者国民健康结果量表(HoNOS-LD)
Br J Psychiatry. 2002 Jan;180:61-6. doi: 10.1192/bjp.180.1.61.
4
Reliability testing of the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales 2018.2018 年国民健康结果量表的可靠性测试。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2024 Oct;31(5):927-932. doi: 10.1111/jpm.13047. Epub 2024 Mar 18.
5
Validation of the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales.《国民健康结果量表》的验证
Br J Psychiatry. 1999 May;174:389-94. doi: 10.1192/bjp.174.5.389.
6
Are the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS) useful for measuring outcomes in older people's mental health services?“国民健康结果量表(HoNOS)”对衡量老年人心理健康服务的结果有用吗?
Aging Ment Health. 2004 Sep;8(5):387-96. doi: 10.1080/13607860410001725063.
7
Do the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales measure outcome?国民健康结果量表能衡量结果吗?
Can J Psychiatry. 2010 Jul;55(7):431-9. doi: 10.1177/070674371005500706.
8
A systematic review of clinician-rated instruments to assess adults' levels of functioning in specialised public sector mental health services.一项关于临床医生评定工具的系统评价,以评估成年人在专门公共部门心理健康服务中的功能水平。
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2017 Apr;51(4):338-354. doi: 10.1177/0004867416688098. Epub 2017 Jan 24.
9
Development and Validation of the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales-Residential Facility (HoNOS-RF).《健康国家结局量表-住宿设施版(HoNOS-RF)的制定与验证》。
Psychiatr Q. 2018 Jun;89(2):461-473. doi: 10.1007/s11126-017-9548-1.
10
The concurrent validity and sensitivity of change of the German version of the health of the nation outcome scales in a psychiatric inpatient setting.在精神病住院环境中,德国版国民健康结果量表变化的同时效度和敏感性。
Psychopathology. 2011;44(6):391-7. doi: 10.1159/000325172. Epub 2011 Sep 29.

引用本文的文献

1
The roles of stress, illness management, and goal setting on the association between personal and clinical recovery - a prospective study.压力、疾病管理和目标设定在个人康复与临床康复关联中的作用——一项前瞻性研究
BMC Psychiatry. 2025 Sep 2;25(1):848. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-07291-4.
2
Subjective language disturbances in young patients at ultra-high risk for psychosis (UHR): what relevance for clinical prognosis? A 2-year follow-up study.超高风险精神病(UHR)年轻患者的主观语言障碍:对临床预后有何关联?一项为期2年的随访研究。
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2025 Aug 28. doi: 10.1007/s00406-025-02094-w.
3
Cost-Effectiveness of Crisis Resolution Home Treatment for Managing Acute Psychiatric Crises in Southern Switzerland.
瑞士南部危机解决家庭治疗对管理急性精神科危机的成本效益分析
Int J Public Health. 2025 Jul 14;70:1608248. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2025.1608248. eCollection 2025.
4
Crisis versus extended care: bimodal distribution of length of stay in psychiatric inpatients.危机护理与长期护理:精神科住院患者住院时长的双峰分布
BMC Psychiatry. 2025 Jul 17;25(1):711. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-07149-9.
5
A comparison of the costs and patterns of expenditure for care for severe mental illness in five countries with different levels of economic development.五个经济发展水平不同的国家中严重精神疾病护理的成本及支出模式比较。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2025 Jul 16;34:e40. doi: 10.1017/S2045796025100140.
6
Latent profile analysis of psychiatric symptoms and the Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities.精神症状的潜在剖面分析以及参与社会角色和活动的能力
BMC Psychol. 2025 Jul 1;13(1):639. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-02946-z.
7
Disparity in immigrant compulsory care assignment: discrimination or response to treatment need.移民强制医疗分配中的差异:歧视还是对治疗需求的回应。
Gen Psychiatr. 2025 Jun 25;38(3):e101532. doi: 10.1136/gpsych-2024-101532. eCollection 2025.
8
Medications associated with dizziness or hypotension and adverse outcomes: an electronic health record study in older adults with dementia.与头晕或低血压及不良结局相关的药物:一项针对老年痴呆症患者的电子健康记录研究
Age Ageing. 2025 May 31;54(6). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afaf154.
9
Risk of bias in routine mental health outcome data: the case of Health of the Nation Outcome Scales.常规心理健康结果数据中的偏倚风险:以国家健康结果量表为例。
BMJ Ment Health. 2025 Jun 5;28(1):e301669. doi: 10.1136/bmjment-2025-301669.
10
The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental and psychosocial functioning, quality of life, and recovery in adults with severe mental illness: Findings from Dutch longitudinal cohorts.新冠疫情对患有严重精神疾病的成年人的心理和社会心理功能、生活质量及康复的影响:来自荷兰纵向队列研究的结果
Eur Psychiatry. 2025 Jun 5;68(1):e74. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2025.10039.