Färm G
Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology, Karolinska Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Acta Derm Venereol. 1998 Mar;78(2):130-5. doi: 10.1080/000155598433476.
It is desirable to further evaluate the clinical relevance of a positive patch test. The repeated open application test (ROAT) has been suggested as such a supplementary method. To compare the results of patch testing with the outcome of ROATs, 13 colophony-sensitive subjects and 9 controls were patch-tested with colophony in a serial dilution test. Five microliters, of three concentrations of a colophony solution and the vehicle were then applied to small test areas on the lower arm, once daily for 2 weeks. Prior to each application, all test sites were examined visually and with bioengineering techniques. In the ROATs, 10/13 colophony-sensitive subjects--but no controls--reacted to a 20% colophony solution, 4 also 1%. A correlation was found between the threshold concentration at patch testing and the outcome of ROATs. There was great variation in the reactivity in the ROATs. Objective measures for evaluating the ROAT reactions gave no further information than visual assessment.
进一步评估斑贴试验阳性的临床相关性是很有必要的。重复开放应用试验(ROAT)已被提议作为一种补充方法。为了比较斑贴试验结果与重复开放应用试验的结果,对13名对松香敏感的受试者和9名对照者进行了松香系列稀释试验的斑贴试验。然后,将三种浓度的松香溶液和赋形剂各5微升涂抹于下臂的小测试区域,每天一次,持续2周。在每次涂抹之前,所有测试部位都通过视觉和生物工程技术进行检查。在重复开放应用试验中,13名对松香敏感的受试者中有10名——但对照者中无人——对20%的松香溶液有反应,4名对1%的溶液也有反应。在斑贴试验的阈值浓度与重复开放应用试验的结果之间发现了相关性。重复开放应用试验中的反应性存在很大差异。评估重复开放应用试验反应的客观测量方法并没有比视觉评估提供更多信息。