Suppr超能文献

住院毛细支气管炎婴儿的脓毒症评估

Sepsis evaluations in hospitalized infants with bronchiolitis.

作者信息

Antonow J A, Hansen K, McKinstry C A, Byington C L

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah, Primary Children's Medical Center, Salt Lake City, USA.

出版信息

Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1998 Mar;17(3):231-6. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199803000-00011.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To define variation in the decision to perform a sepsis evaluation in hospitalized infants with bronchiolitis, to define predictors of the decision and to measure the clinical and cost outcomes.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review of all nonintensive care unit infants < or = 60 days with any discharge diagnosis of bronchiolitis (n = 282 from 1993 to 1995 in a 232-bed pediatric hospital. Process variables included temperature at sepsis work-up or Tmax if no sepsis workup. Outcome variables were charges, length of stay, sepsis workup and serious bacterial infection.

RESULTS

There was no difference in mean temperature between groups with or without sepsis evaluation (38.1 degrees C, P = 0.75). Of 282 infants 140 had a sepsis workup; 5 (1.8%) had serious bacterial infection. Infants with sepsis workup had an average total charge of $4507 and length of stay of 3.4 days compared with $2998 and 2.8 days for those without (P = 0.0001 and P = 0.002, respectively). A multivariate logistic regression model was constructed with sepsis workup as the dichotomous dependent variable. Significant (P < or = 0.05) predictor variables with a positive coefficient were: higher bronchiolitis score and normal chest roentgenogram. Significant variables with a negative coefficient were: admission diagnosis of bronchiolitis, chest roentgenogram typical for bronchiolitis and age > 28 days.

CONCLUSIONS

Temperature was not a predictor of sepsis evaluation. Infants with respiratory distress and normal chest roentgenogram were more likely to receive sepsis evaluations; those with recognized typical bronchiolitis and those > 28 days of age were less likely. Risk of serious bacterial infection is low; the costs of a sepsis evaluation outweigh the benefits in infants with obvious bronchiolitis.

摘要

目的

确定对住院毛细支气管炎婴儿进行脓毒症评估决策的差异,确定该决策的预测因素,并衡量临床和成本结果。

方法

对所有入住非重症监护病房、年龄≤60天且出院诊断为毛细支气管炎的婴儿进行回顾性病历审查(1993年至1995年期间,在一家拥有232张床位的儿科医院中有282例)。过程变量包括进行脓毒症检查时的体温,若未进行脓毒症检查则为最高体温(Tmax)。结果变量包括费用、住院时间、脓毒症检查和严重细菌感染。

结果

进行脓毒症评估组和未进行脓毒症评估组的平均体温无差异(38.1摄氏度,P = 0.75)。282例婴儿中,140例进行了脓毒症检查;5例(1.8%)发生严重细菌感染。进行脓毒症检查的婴儿平均总费用为4507美元,住院时间为3.4天,未进行脓毒症检查的婴儿分别为2998美元和2.8天(P分别为0.0001和0.002)。构建了一个多因素逻辑回归模型,以脓毒症检查作为二分因变量。系数为正的显著(P≤0.05)预测变量为:较高的毛细支气管炎评分和胸部X线片正常。系数为负的显著变量为:毛细支气管炎的入院诊断、典型毛细支气管炎的胸部X线片以及年龄>28天。

结论

体温不是脓毒症评估的预测因素。有呼吸窘迫且胸部X线片正常的婴儿更有可能接受脓毒症评估;而那些已确诊为典型毛细支气管炎的婴儿以及年龄>28天的婴儿接受脓毒症评估的可能性较小。严重细菌感染的风险较低;对于患有明显毛细支气管炎的婴儿,脓毒症评估的成本超过了其益处。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验