Okada H, Yamanaka N, Oh-Oka H, Gotoh A, Nakamura I, Hara I, Fujisawa M, Gohji K, Arakawa S, Kamidono S
Department of Urology, Kobe University School of Medicine, Japan.
Int J Urol. 1998 Jan;5(1):22-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.1998.tb00228.x.
At Kobe University Hospital we have created orthotopic neobladders since 1988 by using several colonic segments. Various types of neobladders were compared and a detailed description of these procedures and the voiding function outcome is presented.
Thirty-two men with invasive bladder carcinoma or recurrent carcinoma in situ underwent a radical cystectomy followed by orthotopic neobladder replacement using a right colonic, ileocolic or sigmoid colonic segment. The functional capacity, percentage of residual urine volume, configuration of the neobladder, and location in the pelvis were evaluated 1 year after surgery. Voiding function was evaluated using a questionnaire which included questions on diurnal and nocturnal continence, and by uroflowmetric analysis.
Operative time, blood loss, and functional neobladder capacity did not differ for the 3 types of neobladders. The configuration of the right colonic and ileocolic neobladders resembled the shape of a rugby ball. The configuration of the sigmoid neobladder was oval. The right colonic and ileocolic neobladders tended to be located along the right side wall of the pelvis. The sigmoid neobladder was located in the center of the pelvis. Daytime and nocturnal continence was not affected by either the type of neobladder or its configuration or position. Neobladders located in the center of the pelvis exhibited a better maximum flow rate than those located along the right wall of the pelvis.
The technical difficulty in constructing the 3 types of neobladders was approximately the same. For better voiding a neobladder should be located in the center of the pelvis.
