Transurethral electrovaporization of the prostate: preliminary clinical results with pressure-flow analysis.

BACKGROUND

We evaluated the safety and efficacy of transurethral electrovaporization of the prostate (TVP) as a new alternative treatment for patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia.

METHODS

A total of 22 patients with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia, including 4 with urinary retention, underwent TVP. If enough of a cavity was not created after 60 minutes of vaporization, transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) was performed successively. International Prostate Symptom Score (I-PSS) with quality-of-life index, maximum flow rate, and postvoid residual volume were measured at baseline and at 2 weeks, 1, 3, and 6 months. A pressure-flow study was performed at baseline and at 3 or 6 months after surgery.

RESULTS

TURP was required in 10 of 22 patients. At 6 months, mean I-PSS decreased from 20.0 to 5.2, quality-of-life index decreased from 4.6 to 1.1, mean maximum flow rate increased from 6.9 to 16.7 mL/s, and postvoid residual volume decreased from 152 to 32 mL. Detrusor pressure at maximum flow decreased from 108 to 39 cm H2O, with a significant relief of bladder outlet obstruction in 93% of the patients. Mean decrease in hematocrit was 4.4%, and in serum sodium, 4.8 mEq/L. None of the patients required transfusions or had TUR syndrome. A urethral stricture and a severe stress incontinence developed in 1 patient.

CONCLUSION

TVP seems to be a safe and effective alternative to a standard TURP associated with fewer intraoperative complications. Although preliminary clinical results have been promising, further study is necessary to establish long-term efficacy and safety of this procedure.