Suppr超能文献

女性角色压力量表的信效度研究

A reliability and validity study of the Women's Role Strain Inventory.

作者信息

Lengacher C A

机构信息

University of South Florida, College of Nursing, Tampa 33612-4799, USA.

出版信息

J Nurs Meas. 1997 Winter;5(2):139-50.

PMID:9538586
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to theoretically conceptualize, develop and test the Women's Role Strain Inventory (WRSI) which assesses role strain in women who have multiple roles. There is limited research published related to role strain of women, although role strain, role conflict and role stress have been documented to have negative and positive effects (Hall 1975, Hall 1992). The theoretical basis for this study is based upon Goode's Theory of Role Strain (1960) and Sieber's Theory of Role Accumulation (1974). The pilot consisted of 62 female nurses, and the sample used for construct validity consisted of 445 female nurses. Content validity resulted in a content validity index of (.91). Exploratory factor analysis with varimax rotation resulted in a three-factor solution supporting Goode's (1960) theory of role strain, and Sieber's (1974) theory of role accumulation. Alpha coefficients for the three subscales were .89 (role distress), .86 (role enhancement), and .81 (role support). Internal consistency of .93 was achieved for the overall WRSI. Test-retest coefficients ranged from .61 to .91. The high reliability and validity of the WRSI make it a reliable and valid instrument to measure role strain of women.

摘要

本研究的目的是从理论上进行概念化、开发并测试女性角色压力量表(WRSI),该量表用于评估承担多种角色的女性的角色压力。尽管已有文献记载角色压力、角色冲突和角色应激具有消极和积极影响(霍尔,1975;霍尔,1992),但关于女性角色压力的相关研究发表较少。本研究的理论基础基于古德的角色压力理论(1960)和西贝尔的角色累积理论(1974)。预试验由62名女护士组成,用于结构效度检验的样本由445名女护士组成。内容效度得出的内容效度指数为(.91)。采用方差最大化旋转的探索性因素分析得出了一个三因素解决方案,支持古德(1960)的角色压力理论和西贝尔(1974)的角色累积理论。三个子量表的阿尔法系数分别为.89(角色困扰)、.86(角色增强)和.81(角色支持)。WRSI总体的内部一致性为.93。重测系数范围为.61至.91。WRSI的高信度和效度使其成为测量女性角色压力的可靠有效工具。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验