Balkau B, Shipley M, Jarrett R J, Pyörälä K, Pyörälä M, Forhan A, Eschwège E
INSERM U21, Villejuif, France.
Diabetes Care. 1998 Mar;21(3):360-7. doi: 10.2337/diacare.21.3.360.
To assess the association between high but nondiabetic blood glucose levels and the risk of death from all causes, coronary heart disease (CHD), cardiovascular disease, and neoplasms.
We studied the 20-year mortality of non-diabetic, working men, age 44-55 years, in three European cohorts known as the Whitehall Study (n = 10,025), the Paris Prospective Study (n = 6,629), and the Helsinki Policeman Study (n = 631). These men were identified by their 2-h glucose levels following an oral glucose tolerance test and by the absence of a prior diagnosis of diabetes. As the protocol for the oral glucose tolerance test and methods for measuring glucose differed between studies, mortality was analyzed according to the percentiles of the 2-h and fasting glucose distributions, using the Cox's proportional hazards model.
Men in the upper 20% of the 2-h glucose distributions and those in the upper 2.5% for fasting glucose had a significantly higher risk of all-cause mortality in comparison with men in the lower 80% of these distributions, with age-adjusted hazard ratios of 1.6 (95% CI 1.4-1.9) and 2.0 (1.6-2.6) for the upper 2.5%. For death from cardiovascular and CHD, men in the upper 2.5% of the 2-h and fasting glucose distributions were at higher risk, with age-adjusted hazard ratios for CHD of 1.8 (1.4-2.4) and 2.7 (1.7-4.4), respectively.
If early intervention aimed at lowering blood glucose concentrations can be shown to reduce mortality, it may be justified to lower the levels of both 2-h and fasting glucose, which define diabetes.
评估高血糖但非糖尿病状态与全因死亡、冠心病(CHD)、心血管疾病及肿瘤死亡风险之间的关联。
我们研究了来自三项欧洲队列研究的44 - 55岁非糖尿病在职男性的20年死亡率,这三项队列研究分别是白厅研究(n = 10,025)、巴黎前瞻性研究(n = 6,629)和赫尔辛基警察研究(n = 631)。这些男性通过口服葡萄糖耐量试验后的2小时血糖水平以及既往无糖尿病诊断来确定。由于不同研究中口服葡萄糖耐量试验方案和血糖测量方法存在差异,故使用Cox比例风险模型,根据2小时和空腹血糖分布的百分位数来分析死亡率。
2小时血糖分布处于最高20%的男性以及空腹血糖处于最高2.5%的男性,与处于这些分布最低80%的男性相比,全因死亡风险显著更高,最高2.5%人群的年龄调整风险比分别为1.6(95% CI 1.4 - 1.9)和2.0(1.6 - 2.6)。对于心血管疾病和冠心病死亡,2小时和空腹血糖分布处于最高2.5%的男性风险更高,冠心病的年龄调整风险比分别为1.8(1.4 - 2.4)和2.7(1.7 - 4.4)。
如果旨在降低血糖浓度的早期干预能够降低死亡率,那么降低定义糖尿病的2小时和空腹血糖水平可能是合理的。