• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

具有固定间隔反应要求的鸽子的拖延行为。

Procrastination by pigeons with fixed-interval response requirements.

作者信息

Mazur J E

机构信息

Psychology Department, Southern Connecticut State University, New Haven, USA.

出版信息

J Exp Anal Behav. 1998 Mar;69(2):185-97. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1998.69-185.

DOI:10.1901/jeab.1998.69-185
PMID:9540230
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1284653/
Abstract

Two experiments studied the phenomenon of procrastination, in which pigeons chose a larger, more delayed response requirement over a smaller, more immediate response requirement. The response requirements were fixed-interval schedules that did not lead to an immediate food reinforcer, but that interrupted a 55-s period in which food was delivered at random times. The experiments used an adjusting-delay procedure in which the delay to the start of one fixed-interval requirement was varied over trials to estimate an indifference point--a delay at which the two alternatives were chosen about equally often. Experiment 1 found that as the delay to a shorter fixed-interval requirement was increased, the adjusting delay to a longer fixed-interval requirement also increased, and the rate of increase depended on the duration of the longer fixed-interval requirement. Experiment 2 found a strong preference for a fixed delay of 10 s to the start of a fixed-interval requirement compared to a mixed delay of either 0 or 20 s. The results help to distinguish among different equations that might describe the decreasing effectiveness of a response requirement with increasing delay, and they suggest that delayed reinforcers and delayed response requirements have symmetrical but opposite effects on choice.

摘要

两项实验研究了拖延现象,即鸽子会选择要求更高、延迟时间更长的反应,而不是要求更低、更即时的反应。反应要求是固定间隔时间表,不会立即带来食物强化,但会中断一个55秒的时间段,在此期间食物会在随机时间发放。实验采用了调整延迟程序,在试验过程中改变一个固定间隔要求开始的延迟时间,以估计无差异点——即两个选项被选择的频率大致相同的延迟时间。实验1发现,随着较短固定间隔要求的延迟时间增加,较长固定间隔要求的调整延迟时间也会增加,且增加速率取决于较长固定间隔要求的持续时间。实验2发现,与0秒或20秒的混合延迟相比,鸽子强烈偏好固定间隔要求开始前10秒的固定延迟。这些结果有助于区分不同的方程,这些方程可能描述随着延迟增加反应要求有效性的降低,并且表明延迟强化物和延迟反应要求对选择有对称但相反的影响。

相似文献

1
Procrastination by pigeons with fixed-interval response requirements.具有固定间隔反应要求的鸽子的拖延行为。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1998 Mar;69(2):185-97. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1998.69-185.
2
Procrastination by pigeons: preference for larger, more delayed work requirements.鸽子的拖延:对更大、延迟更多的工作要求的偏好。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1996 Jan;65(1):159-71. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1996.65-159.
3
Effects of reinforcer probability, delay, and response requirements on the choices of rats and pigeons: possible species differences.强化物概率、延迟及反应要求对大鼠和鸽子选择的影响:可能存在的物种差异
J Exp Anal Behav. 2005 May;83(3):263-79. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2005.69-04.
4
Effects of intertrial reinforcers on self-control choice.试验间强化物对自我控制选择的影响。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1994 Jan;61(1):83-96. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1994.61-83.
5
Choice between delayed reinforcers and fixed-ratio schedules requiring forceful responding.在延迟强化物与需要有力反应的固定比率计划之间进行选择。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1990 Jan;53(1):175-87. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1990.53-175.
6
Choice between single and multiple delayed reinforcers.单一延迟强化物与多个延迟强化物之间的选择。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1986 Jul;46(1):67-77. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1986.46-67.
7
Choice with delayed and probabilistic reinforcers: effects of variability, time between trials, and conditioned reinforcers.延迟和概率性强化物的选择:变异性、试验间隔时间和条件性强化物的影响。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1992 Nov;58(3):513-25. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1992.58-513.
8
Procrastination in the pigeon: Can conditioned reinforcement increase the likelihood of human procrastination?鸽子的拖延:条件强化会增加人类拖延的可能性吗?
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Oct;25(5):1952-1957. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1409-2.
9
Tests of transitivity in choices between fixed and variable reinforcer delays.固定与可变强化延迟选择中的传递性测试。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1987 May;47(3):287-97. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1987.47-287.
10
Molar optimization versus delayed reinforcement as explanations of choice between fixed-ratio and progressive-ratio schedules.作为对固定比率和累进比率时间表之间选择的解释的摩尔优化与延迟强化
J Exp Anal Behav. 1987 Sep;48(2):251-61. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1987.48-251.

引用本文的文献

1
Further analysis of variables that affect self-control with aversive events.进一步分析影响自我控制的变量与厌恶事件。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2012 Summer;45(2):299-313. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2012.45-299.
2
What 50 years of research tell us about pausing under ratio schedules of reinforcement.50年的研究告诉了我们关于在强化比率时间表下停顿的哪些信息。
Behav Anal. 2008 Spring;31(1):39-60. doi: 10.1007/BF03392160.

本文引用的文献

1
Stimulus-food relations and free-operant postponement of timeout from response-independent food presentation.刺激-食物关系和自由操作延迟,即从与反应无关的食物呈现中延迟反应时间。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1983 Sep;40(2):153-63. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1983.40-153.
2
Preference for mixed versus constant delays of reinforcement: Effect of probability of the short, mixed delay.对混合与固定强化时距的偏好:短的混合时距的概率效应。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1983 Mar;39(2):257-66. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1983.39-257.
3
Incentive theory: II. Models for choice.激励理论:二、选择模型。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1982 Sep;38(2):217-32. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1982.38-217.
4
Toward a quantitative theory of punishment.迈向惩罚的定量理论。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1980 Jan;33(1):15-25. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1980.33-15.
5
Preference for mixed versus constant delay of reinforcement.对混合与固定延迟强化的偏好。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1976 Mar;25(2):257-61. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1976.25-257.
6
Choice and the rate of punishment in concurrent schedules.在并行时间表中选择和惩罚率。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1976 Jan;25(1):75-80. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1976.25-75.
7
Impulse control in pigeons.鸽子的冲动控制。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1974 May;21(3):485-9. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1974.21-485.
8
Commitment, choice and self-control.承诺、选择和自我控制。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1972 Jan;17(1):15-22. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1972.17-15.
9
Negative reinforcement without shock reduction.无电击的负强化。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1970 Nov;14(3):259-68. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1970.14-259.
10
Separating the effects of interreinforcement time and number of interreinforcement responses.分离强化时间和强化反应次数的影响。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1968 Nov;11(6):661-7. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1968.11-661.