Suppr超能文献

医生与患者对制药行业礼品态度的比较

A comparison of physicians' and patients' attitudes toward pharmaceutical industry gifts.

作者信息

Gibbons R V, Landry F J, Blouch D L, Jones D L, Williams F K, Lucey C R, Kroenke K

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 1998 Mar;13(3):151-4. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1998.00048.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare physicians' and their patients' attitudes toward pharmaceutical gifts.

DESIGN

Survey of physicians and their patients.

SETTING

Two tertiary-care medical centers, one military and one civilian.

PARTICIPANTS

Two hundred sixty-eight of 392 consecutively surveyed physicians, 100 of 103 randomly selected patients at the military center, and 96 patients in a convenience sample at the civilian center completed the survey.

MEASUREMENTS

Participants rated 10 pharmaceutical gifts on whether they were appropriate for physicians to accept and whether they were likely to influence prescribing. Patients found gifts less appropriate and more influential than did their physicians. About half of the patients were aware of such gifts; of those unaware, 24% responded that this knowledge altered their perception of the medical profession. Asked whether they thought their own physician accepted gifts, 27% said yes, 20% no, and 53% were unsure. For patients, feeling that gifts were inappropriate was best predicted by a belief that gifts might influence prescribing, while for physicians, the best predictor was knowledge of guidelines.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients feel pharmaceutical gifts are more influential and less appropriate than do their physicians. Physicians may want to consider this in deciding whether to accept particular gifts. Broader dissemination of guidelines may be one means of changing physician behavior. At the same time, future guidelines should further consider the potentially different viewpoints of patients and physicians.

摘要

目的

比较医生及其患者对医药礼品的态度。

设计

对医生及其患者进行调查。

地点

两家三级医疗中心,一家军队医院和一家 civilian(此处可能有误,推测为“民营”或“地方”)医院。

参与者

在连续调查的392名医生中,有268名完成了调查;在军队医院随机抽取的103名患者中,有100名完成了调查;在民营医院便利样本中的96名患者完成了调查。

测量方法

参与者对10种医药礼品在医生是否适合接受以及是否可能影响处方开具方面进行评分。患者认为礼品比医生认为的更不合适且更具影响力。约一半的患者知晓此类礼品;在那些不知情的患者中,24%的人表示这一认知改变了他们对医疗行业的看法。当被问及他们是否认为自己的医生接受礼品时,27%的人回答是,20%的人回答否,53%的人不确定。对于患者而言,认为礼品不合适的最佳预测因素是相信礼品可能影响处方开具,而对于医生来说,最佳预测因素是对指南的了解。

结论

患者认为医药礼品比医生认为的更具影响力且更不合适。医生在决定是否接受特定礼品时可能需要考虑这一点。更广泛地传播指南可能是改变医生行为的一种方式。同时,未来的指南应进一步考虑患者和医生潜在的不同观点。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

2
Mapping conflict of interests: scoping review.利益冲突映射:范围综述。
BMJ. 2021 Nov 3;375:e066576. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2021-066576.
10
Opioid Prescribing: How Well Do We Know Ourselves?阿片类药物处方:我们对自己了解多少?
J Med Toxicol. 2016 Sep;12(3):221-3. doi: 10.1007/s13181-016-0576-2. Epub 2016 Aug 4.

本文引用的文献

5
Centers for education and research in therapeutics.
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1994 Mar;55(3):249-55. doi: 10.1038/clpt.1994.24.
8
Pharmaceutical representatives in academic medical centers: interaction with faculty and housestaff.
J Gen Intern Med. 1990 May-Jun;5(3):240-3. doi: 10.1007/BF02600542.
9
Physicians and the pharmaceutical industry. American College of Physicians.
Ann Intern Med. 1990 Apr 15;112(8):624-6. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-112-8-624.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验