Foja C, Wiedemann P
Klinik und Poliklinik für Augenheilkunde der Universität, Leipzig.
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 1998 Jan;212(1):aA10-14.
Different opinions about the reliability and serious complications after regional anesthesia have been reported. The paper describes our experiences in deciding about regional or general anesthesia for ophthalmic surgery.
For this report we analyzed retrospectively our protocols of all operations performed in 1995. Eight categories of procedures were developed to give an insight in our way of decision for local or general anesthesia. We imagine the applied technique of peribulbaranesthesia.
3184 patients were operated on in 1995, in the regional anesthesia group the age ranges from 17 to 96 years, in the general anesthesia group from 3 months to 85 years. In 69.9% of all patients we performed a local anesthesia and in 30.1% we chose general anesthesia. The spread of cases and the surgical procedure corresponding to one of these eight classes below are described in this survey.
Almost 70% of our patients who underwent an ophthalmosurgical procedure were operated on under regional anesthesia. No serious complications have occurred and no procedure had do be stopped off due to an insufficient analgesia or akinesia. We demonstrate some observations concerning the duration of pain after the injection and our indications for general anesthesia in ophthalmic surgery.
