Roca-Cusachs A, Oigman W, Lepe L, Cifkova R, Karpov Y A, Harron D W
Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain.
Acta Cardiol. 1997;52(6):495-506.
The antihypertensive efficacy and safety of losartan, a specific and selective angiotensin II (AII) receptor antagonist, was compared to captopril in patients with mild or moderate essential hypertension.
This multinational, randomized trial consisted of a 4-week single-blind, placebo baseline period followed by a 12-week double-blind, parallel comparison of once-daily administration of losartan 50 mg or twice-daily administration of captopril 25 mg. After 6 weeks of treatment, the daily dosage was doubled in patients whose sitting diastolic blood pressure (SiDBP) remained > or = 90 mm Hg.
Patients with essential hypertension having a mean trough SiDBP of 95-115 mm Hg after the placebo baseline period were randomized to losartan (N = 192) or captopril (N = 204) treatment.
The primary efficacy variable was the mean change from baseline to Week 12 in trough SiDBP. Safety was assessed by recording spontaneously reported or observed adverse experiences and clinical laboratory measurements.
After 12 weeks, both treatments produced clinically important reductions in trough SiDBP and sitting systolic blood pressure (SiSBP). These mean reductions (SiDBP, SiSBP) were significantly greater in the losartan group (-11.5 and -15.4 mm Hg, respectively) than in the captopril group (-9.3 and -12.2 mm Hg, respectively) (p = 0.010 for diastolic and p = 0.023 for systolic). The percentage of patients exhibiting an excellent (trough SiDBP < 90 mm Hg) or good (trough SiDBP > 90 mm Hg, with decrease of > or = 10 mm Hg) antihypertensive response to losartan and captopril therapy at Week 12 was comparable (60.0% and 54.7%, respectively). The percentage of patients reporting a clinical adverse experience considered drug-related by the investigator was 13% in the captopril group and 10% in the losartan group. The incidence of drug-related cough was 2.6% in the losartan group and 4.4% in the captopril group.
Once daily administration of losartan 50 to 100 mg is an effective treatment for patients with essential mild to moderate hypertension. The antihypertensive efficacy of losartan 50/100 mg is significantly greater than that of twice daily captopril 25/50 mg. Both treatments were generally well-tolerated. The number of patients with the side effect of cough was higher following captopril.
在轻度或中度原发性高血压患者中,将特异性和选择性血管紧张素II(AII)受体拮抗剂氯沙坦的降压疗效和安全性与卡托普利进行了比较。
这项多国随机试验包括为期4周的单盲、安慰剂基线期,随后是为期12周的双盲、平行比较,每日一次服用50 mg氯沙坦或每日两次服用25 mg卡托普利。治疗6周后,坐位舒张压(SiDBP)仍≥90 mmHg的患者每日剂量加倍。
在安慰剂基线期后平均谷值SiDBP为95 - 115 mmHg的原发性高血压患者被随机分为氯沙坦组(N = 192)或卡托普利组(N = 204)进行治疗。
主要疗效变量是从基线到第12周谷值SiDBP的平均变化。通过记录自发报告或观察到的不良事件以及临床实验室测量来评估安全性。
12周后,两种治疗均使谷值SiDBP和坐位收缩压(SiSBP)产生了具有临床意义的降低。氯沙坦组这些平均降低值(SiDBP、SiSBP)分别为-11.5和-15.4 mmHg,显著大于卡托普利组(分别为-9.3和-12.2 mmHg)(舒张压p = 0.010,收缩压p = 0.023)。在第12周时,对氯沙坦和卡托普利治疗表现出良好(谷值SiDBP < 90 mmHg)或较好(谷值SiDBP > 90 mmHg且降低≥10 mmHg)降压反应的患者百分比相当(分别为60.0%和54.7%)。研究者认为与药物相关的临床不良事件报告患者百分比在卡托普利组为13%,在氯沙坦组为10%。与药物相关的咳嗽发生率在氯沙坦组为2.6%,在卡托普利组为4.4%。
每日一次服用50至100 mg氯沙坦对轻度至中度原发性高血压患者是一种有效的治疗方法。50/100 mg氯沙坦的降压疗效显著高于每日两次服用25/50 mg卡托普利。两种治疗总体耐受性良好。卡托普利治疗后咳嗽副作用的患者数量较多。