Hennig A K, Cotanche D A
Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.
J Neurosci. 1998 May 1;18(9):3282-96. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-09-03282.1998.
Chickens recover auditory function after hair cell loss caused by ototoxic drug damage or acoustic overstimulation, indicating that mechanisms exist to reestablish appropriate neuronal connections to regenerated hair cells. However, despite similar hair cell regeneration times, hearing recovery takes substantially longer after aminoglycoside than after sound damage. We have therefore begun examining damage and regeneration of efferent nerve terminals by immunolabeling whole-mount cochleae for differentially localized synaptic proteins and by visualizing the distribution of label with confocal microscopy. In undamaged cochleae, the synaptic proteins synapsin and syntaxin show similar distribution patterns corresponding to the large cup-like terminals on short hair cells. After gentamycin administration, these terminals are disrupted as hair cells are lost, leaving smaller, more numerous synapsin-reactive structures in the sensory epithelium. Syntaxin reactivity remains associated with the extruded hair cells, indicating that the presynaptic membrane is still attached to the postsynaptic site. In contrast, after sound damage, both synapsin and syntaxin reactivity are lost from the epithelium with extruded hair cells. As regenerated hair cells differentiate after gentamycin treatment, the synapsin labeling associated with cup-like efferent endings reappears but is not completely restored even after 60 d of recovery. Thus, efferent terminals are reestablished much more slowly than after sound damage (), consistent with the prolonged loss of hearing function. This in vivo model system allows comparison of axonal reconnection after either complete loss (sound damage) or partial disruption (gentamycin treatment) of axon terminals. Elucidating the differences in recovery between these injuries can provide insights into reinnervation mechanisms.
鸡在受到耳毒性药物损伤或声学过度刺激导致毛细胞损失后可恢复听觉功能,这表明存在重新建立与再生毛细胞的适当神经元连接的机制。然而,尽管毛细胞再生时间相似,但氨基糖苷类药物损伤后听力恢复所需的时间比声音损伤后长得多。因此,我们开始通过对整个耳蜗进行免疫标记以检测差异定位的突触蛋白,并利用共聚焦显微镜观察标记物的分布,来研究传出神经末梢的损伤和再生情况。在未受损的耳蜗中,突触蛋白和 syntaxin 显示出相似的分布模式,与短毛细胞上的大杯状末梢相对应。给予庆大霉素后,随着毛细胞的损失,这些末梢被破坏,感觉上皮中留下更小、数量更多的突触蛋白反应性结构。Syntaxin 反应性仍与挤出的毛细胞相关,表明突触前膜仍附着于突触后位点。相比之下,声音损伤后,挤出毛细胞的上皮中突触蛋白和 syntaxin 反应性均消失。庆大霉素处理后再生毛细胞分化时,与杯状传出末梢相关的突触蛋白标记重新出现,但即使在恢复 60 天后也未完全恢复。因此,传出末梢的重建比声音损伤后慢得多,这与听力功能的长期丧失一致。这个体内模型系统可以比较轴突末梢完全丧失(声音损伤)或部分破坏(庆大霉素处理)后的轴突重新连接情况。阐明这些损伤后恢复的差异可以为再支配机制提供见解。