Mizes J S, Sloan D M
Department of Psychology, Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine, Pennsylvania 19131-1693, USA.
Int J Eat Disord. 1998 Apr;23(3):233-42. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1098-108x(199804)23:3<233::aid-eat1>3.0.co;2-k.
In recent years, there has been debate concerning whether distinct subgroups exist within the eating disorder, not otherwise specified (EDNOS) diagnostic category. One subgroup that has been suggested is binge-eating disorder (BED). While BED has received some research attention, relatively little is known about other possible subgroups within the EDNOS category. The purpose of the present study is to empirically investigate whether distinct subgroups exist within the diagnostic category of EDNOS.
Participants were 53 EDNOS patients who presented to psychotherapy clinics for treatment of an eating disorder. Information gathered from a clinical assessment, which included a clinical interview and self-report questionnaires, was used in the analyses of the study.
Using cluster analytic procedures, two subgroups of patients diagnosed with EDNOS were identified. The two subgroups differed from each other in terms of weight, binging, and body image variables. Specifically, the second subgroup (of 11 patients) appeared to be a distinct subgroup of overweight binge-eating patients, while the first subgroup appeared to be a heterogenous group of EDNOS patients. The overweight binge-eating subgroup was significantly higher in current weight, in reported highest adult weight, in reported higher lowest adult weight, and had more binges per week than the heterogenous EDNOS subgroup. Interestingly, the two subgroups did not differ in terms of self-reported purging and/or compensatory behaviors (e.g., vomiting and laxative use).
The results of the present study provide preliminary support for a distinct subgroup within the EDNOS diagnostic category. This subgroup resembles BED, with the exception of the presence of purging behaviors. The findings of the present study suggest the need to further investigate the exclusionary criteria of purging/compensatory behaviors for the BED diagnosis.
近年来,关于进食障碍未特定型(EDNOS)诊断类别中是否存在不同亚组一直存在争议。其中一个被提出的亚组是暴食症(BED)。虽然暴食症已受到一些研究关注,但对于EDNOS类别中其他可能的亚组了解相对较少。本研究的目的是实证调查EDNOS诊断类别中是否存在不同亚组。
研究参与者为53名因进食障碍前往心理治疗诊所接受治疗的EDNOS患者。研究分析使用了从临床评估中收集的信息,包括临床访谈和自我报告问卷。
采用聚类分析程序,识别出了两个被诊断为EDNOS的患者亚组。这两个亚组在体重、暴食和身体形象变量方面存在差异。具体而言,第二个亚组(11名患者)似乎是超重暴食患者的一个独特亚组,而第一个亚组似乎是一个异质性的EDNOS患者群体。超重暴食亚组在当前体重、报告的最高成人体重、报告的较高最低成人体重方面显著更高,且每周的暴食次数比异质性EDNOS亚组更多。有趣的是,两个亚组在自我报告的清除和/或代偿行为(如呕吐和使用泻药)方面没有差异。
本研究结果为EDNOS诊断类别中的一个独特亚组提供了初步支持。这个亚组类似于暴食症,但存在清除行为除外。本研究结果表明需要进一步调查暴食症诊断中清除/代偿行为的排除标准。