Bellows Brandon K, DuVall Scott L, Kamauu Aaron W C, Supina Dylan, Pawaskar Manjiri, Babcock Thomas, LaFleur Joanne
VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, UT, USA; University of Utah College of Pharmacy, Salt Lake City, UT, USA; SelectHealth, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, UT, USA; University of Utah College of Pharmacy, Salt Lake City, UT, USA; University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Eat Behav. 2016 Apr;21:161-7. doi: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2016.03.013. Epub 2016 Mar 4.
In 2013 binge-eating disorder (BED) was recognized as a formal diagnosis, but was historically included under the diagnosis code for eating disorder not otherwise specified (EDNOS). This study compared the characteristics and use of treatment modalities in BED patients to those with EDNOS without BED (EDNOS-only) and to matched-patients with no eating disorders (NED).
Patients were identified for this study from electronic health records in the Department of Veterans Affairs from 2000 to 2011. Patients with BED were identified using natural language processing and patients with EDNOS-only were identified by ICD-9 code (307.50). First diagnosis defined index date for these groups. NED patients were frequency matched to BED patients up to 4:1, as available, on age, sex, BMI, depression, and index month encounter. Baseline characteristics and use of treatment modalities during the post-index year were compared using t-tests or chi-square tests.
There were 593 BED, 1354 EDNOS-only, and 1895 matched-NED patients identified. Only 68 patients with BED had an EDNOS diagnosis. BED patients were younger (48.7 vs. 49.8years, p=0.04), more were male (72.2% vs. 62.8%, p<0.001) and obese (BMI 40.2 vs. 37.0, p<0.001) than EDNOS-only patients. In the follow-up period fewer BED (68.0%) than EDNOS-only patients (87.6%, p<0.001), but more BED than NED patients (51.9%, p<0.001) used at least one treatment modality.
The characteristics of BED patients were different from those with EDNOS-only and NED as was their use of treatment modalities. These differences highlight the need for a separate identifier of BED.
2013年暴饮暴食症(BED)被确认为一种正式诊断,但在历史上它被纳入未另行规定的进食障碍(EDNOS)的诊断编码之下。本研究比较了BED患者与无BED的EDNOS患者(仅EDNOS)以及匹配的无进食障碍患者(NED)的特征和治疗方式的使用情况。
本研究从退伍军人事务部2000年至2011年的电子健康记录中识别患者。使用自然语言处理识别BED患者,通过ICD - 9编码(307.50)识别仅EDNOS患者。首次诊断确定这些组的索引日期。NED患者根据年龄、性别、体重指数、抑郁情况和索引月就诊情况与BED患者进行频率匹配,比例最高为4:1(如有可能)。使用t检验或卡方检验比较索引年后的基线特征和治疗方式的使用情况。
共识别出593例BED患者、1354例仅EDNOS患者和1895例匹配的NED患者。只有68例BED患者有EDNOS诊断。BED患者比仅EDNOS患者更年轻(48.7岁对49.8岁,p = 0.04),男性比例更高(72.2%对62.8%,p < 0.001)且更肥胖(体重指数40.2对37.0,p < 0.001)。在随访期间,使用至少一种治疗方式的BED患者(68.0%)少于仅EDNOS患者(87.6%,p < 0.001),但多于NED患者(51.9%,p < 0.001)。
BED患者的特征与仅EDNOS患者和NED患者不同,他们对治疗方式的使用情况也不同。这些差异凸显了对BED进行单独识别的必要性。