Ketelaars C A, Huyer Abu-Saad H, Halfens R J, Schlösser M A, Mostert R, Wouters E F
Department of Nursing Science, University of Limburg, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Heart Lung. 1998 Mar-Apr;27(2):109-20. doi: 10.1016/s0147-9563(98)90018-8.
To investigate the effects of specialized respiratory home nursing care after discharge from a pulmonary rehabilitation center.
Pretest-posttest control group design. Patients in the experimental group were visited by a nurse who specializes in respiratory care, whereas the control group received care from nurses who did not specialize in respiratory care.
Data were collected on admission, at program discharge, and 4 months and 9 months after discharge from a pulmonary rehabilitation center.
One hundred fifteen patients were included in the study and observed for 1 year.
Health-related quality of life (HRQL), coping strategies, compliance, hospitalization, and satisfaction with the care provided.
Complete data sets were obtained from 78 patients with severe airflow obstruction (FEV1 = 41%; predicted +/- SD = 15). Corrections were made for the selective nonresponse, but did not lead to adjustments in outcome scores. In both groups, HRQL scores improved between admission and discharge, but deteriorated 4 months and 9 months after discharge. The only statistically significant short-term effect was found on the "activities" component of HRQL in favor of the control group. No differences were found between groups regarding coping, compliance, and hospitalization. Patients in the experimental group, however, were more satisfied with the care provided by the specialized community nurses.
The treatment intervention of specialized respiratory home nursing might not have been specific or intensive enough to result in outcome benefits. Secondly, the initial benefits from baseline pulmonary rehabilitation alone may have led to positive outcomes in both patient groups.
探讨肺部康复中心出院后专业呼吸家庭护理的效果。
前后测对照组设计。实验组由专业呼吸护理护士访视,而对照组由非专业呼吸护理护士提供护理。
在肺部康复中心入院时、项目出院时以及出院后4个月和9个月收集数据。
115名患者纳入研究并观察1年。
健康相关生活质量(HRQL)、应对策略、依从性、住院情况以及对所提供护理的满意度。
从78名严重气流受限患者(FEV1 = 41%;预测值 +/- 标准差 = 15)获得完整数据集。对选择性无应答进行了校正,但未导致结果评分调整。两组在入院和出院之间HRQL评分均有所改善,但在出院后4个月和9个月恶化。在HRQL的“活动”部分发现唯一具有统计学意义的短期效应有利于对照组。在应对、依从性和住院情况方面两组未发现差异。然而,实验组患者对专业社区护士提供的护理更满意。
专业呼吸家庭护理的治疗干预可能不够具体或密集,无法带来结果益处。其次,仅基线肺部康复的初始益处可能导致两组患者都出现积极结果。