Galm R, Rittmeister M, Schmitt E
Wirbelsäulenklinik Bad Homburg, Kaiser-Friedrich Promenade, Germany.
Eur Spine J. 1998;7(1):55-8. doi: 10.1007/s005860050028.
To our knowledge, quantitative studies on the significance of disorders of the upper cervical spine as a cause of vertigo or impaired hearing do not exist. We examined the cervical spines of 67 patients who presented with symptoms of dizziness. Prior to the orthopaedic examination, causes of vertigo relating to the field of ENT and neurology had been ruled out. Fifty patients of the above-mentioned group were studied. They followed the outlined treatment protocol with physical therapy and were available for 3 months of follow-up. Thirty-one patients, hereinafter referred to as group A, were diagnosed with dysfunctions of the upper cervical spine. Nineteen patients, hereinafter referred to as group B, did not show signs of dysfunction. Cervical spine dysfunctions were documented as published by Bischoff. In group A dysfunctions were found at level C1 in 14 cases, at level C2 in 6 cases and at level C3 in 4 cases. In seven cases more than one upper cervical spine motion segment was affected. Dysfunctions were treated and resolved with mobilising and manipulative techniques of manual medicine. Regardless of cervical spine findings seen at the initial visit, group A and B patients received intensive outpatient physical therapy. At the final 3-month follow-up, 24 patients of group A (77.4%) reported an improvement of their chief symptom and 5 patients were completely free of vertigo. Improvement of vertigo was recorded in 5 group B patients (26.3%); however, nobody in group B was free of symptoms. We concluded that a functional examination of motion segments of the upper cervical spine is important in diagnosing and treating vertigo, because a non-resolved dysfunction of the upper cervical spine was a common cause of long-lasting dizziness in our population.
据我们所知,目前尚无关于上颈椎紊乱作为眩晕或听力受损原因的定量研究。我们检查了67例有头晕症状患者的颈椎。在进行骨科检查之前,已排除了与耳鼻喉科和神经科领域相关的眩晕原因。对上述组中的50例患者进行了研究。他们遵循了包括物理治疗的既定治疗方案,并接受了3个月的随访。31例患者(以下简称A组)被诊断为上颈椎功能障碍。19例患者(以下简称B组)未表现出功能障碍迹象。颈椎功能障碍按照比肖夫公布的方法记录。在A组中,14例在C1水平发现功能障碍,6例在C2水平,4例在C3水平。7例患者不止一个上颈椎运动节段受累。通过手法医学的松动和整复技术对功能障碍进行了治疗并使其得到缓解。无论初次就诊时颈椎检查结果如何,A组和B组患者均接受了强化门诊物理治疗。在最后的3个月随访中,A组24例患者(77.4%)报告其主要症状有所改善,5例患者完全没有眩晕症状。B组有5例患者(26.3%)眩晕症状有所改善;然而,B组中无人完全无症状。我们得出结论,对上颈椎运动节段进行功能检查对眩晕的诊断和治疗很重要,因为上颈椎未解决的功能障碍是我们研究人群中持续性头晕的常见原因。