Mitchell P H, Ferketich S, Jennings B M
Biobehavioral Nursing and Health Systems, University of Washington School of Nursing, Seattle 98195-7266, USA.
Image J Nurs Sch. 1998;30(1):43-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.1998.tb01234.x.
Donabedian's 1966 framework of structure, process, and outcome has guided three decades of study in the United States of the elements needed to evaluate and compare medical care quality. Donabedian's perspective was essentially linear, assuming that structures affect processes, which in turn affect outcomes. Patient characteristics are sometimes considered as mediating outcomes and clinical interventions are considered to be processes. A model is presented in the following article that relates multiple factors affecting quality of care to desired outcomes. It extends previous models by positing dynamic relationships with indicators that not only act upon, but reciprocally affect the various components.
The proposed model was derived from a synthesis of the authors' experience in quality of care practice and research, as well as selected previous theories.
The quality health outcomes model is sufficiently broad (a) to guide development of databases for quality improvement and outcomes management, (b) to suggest key variables in clinical intervention research, and (c) to provide a framework for outcomes research and outcomes management that compares not only treatment options, but organizational or system level interventions. The model also has several policy implications.
唐纳贝迪安1966年提出的结构、过程和结果框架,指导了美国三十年来对评估和比较医疗质量所需要素的研究。唐纳贝迪安的观点本质上是线性的,即认为结构影响过程,而过程又影响结果。患者特征有时被视为调节结果的因素,临床干预则被视为过程。以下文章提出了一个模型,该模型将影响医疗质量的多个因素与期望的结果联系起来。它通过与指标建立动态关系扩展了先前的模型,这些指标不仅作用于各个组成部分,而且相互影响。
所提出的模型源自作者在医疗质量实践和研究中的经验以及先前选定的理论的综合。
质量健康结果模型足够宽泛,(a)可指导用于质量改进和结果管理的数据库的开发,(b)可提示临床干预研究中的关键变量,(c)可为结果研究和结果管理提供一个框架,该框架不仅可比较治疗方案,还可比较组织或系统层面的干预措施。该模型还具有若干政策含义。