Popkin M K, Lurie N, Manning W, Harman J, Callies A, Gray D, Christianson J
Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN 55415, USA.
Psychiatr Serv. 1998 Apr;49(4):518-23. doi: 10.1176/ps.49.4.518.
Changes in the process of psychiatric care received by Medicaid beneficiaries with schizophrenia were examined after the introduction of capitated payments for enrollees of some community mental health centers (CMHCs) under the Utah Prepaid Mental Health Plan.
Data from the medical records of 200 patients receiving care in CMHCs participating in the prepaid plan were compared with data from the records of 200 patients in nonparticipating CMHCs, which remained in a fee-for-service reimbursement arrangement. Using the Process of Care Review Form, trained abstracters gathered data characterizing general patient management, social support, medication management, and medical management before implementation of the plan in 1990 and for three follow-up years. Using regression techniques, differences in the adjusted changes between third-year follow-up and baseline were examined by treatment site.
By year 3 at the CMHCs participating in the plan, psychotherapy visits decreased, the probability of a patient's terminating treatment or being lost to follow-up increased, the probability of having a case manager increased, the probability of a crisis visit decreased (but still exceeded that at the nonplan sites), and the probability of treatment for a month or longer with a suboptimal dosage of antipsychotic medication increased. Only modest changes in the process of care were observed at the nonplan CMHCs.
Change in the process of psychiatric care was more evident at the sites participating in the plan, where traditional therapeutic encounters were de-emphasized in response to capitation. The array of changes raises questions about the vigor of care provided to a highly vulnerable group of patients.
在犹他州预付心理健康计划下,对部分社区心理健康中心(CMHCs)的参保人引入按人头付费后,研究患有精神分裂症的医疗补助受益人的精神病护理过程变化。
将参与预付计划的CMHCs中接受护理的200名患者的病历数据,与仍采用按服务收费报销安排的非参与CMHCs中200名患者的病历数据进行比较。使用护理过程审查表,经过培训的摘要员收集了1990年计划实施前以及随后三年随访期间,描述一般患者管理、社会支持、药物管理和医疗管理的相关数据。运用回归技术,按治疗地点对第三年随访与基线之间调整后的变化差异进行了研究。
到参与计划的CMHCs的第三年,心理治疗就诊次数减少,患者终止治疗或失访的概率增加,有个案管理员的概率增加,危机就诊概率降低(但仍超过非计划地点),使用次优剂量抗精神病药物治疗一个月或更长时间的概率增加。在非计划的CMHCs中,仅观察到护理过程有适度变化。
在参与计划的地点,精神病护理过程的变化更为明显,这些地方因按人头付费而不再强调传统治疗接触。这一系列变化引发了对为这一高度脆弱患者群体提供护理力度的质疑。