Stoner T, Manning W, Christianson J, Gray D Z, Marriott S
School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, USA.
Health Care Financ Rev. 1997 Spring;18(3):73-93.
This article examines the effect of a mental health carve-out, the Utah Prepaid Mental Health Plan (UPMHP), on expenditures for mental health treatment and utilization of mental health services for Medicaid beneficiaries from July 1991 through December 1994. Three Community Mental Health Centers (CMHCs) provided mental health services to Medicaid beneficiaries in their catchment areas in return for capitated payments. The analysis uses data from Medicaid claims as well as "shadow claims" for UPMHP contracting sites. The analysis is a pre/post comparison of expenditures and utilization rates, with a contemporaneous control group in the Utah catchment areas not in the UPMHP. The results indicate that the UPMHP reduced acute inpatient mental health expenditures and admissions for Medicaid beneficiaries during the first 2 1/2 years of the UPMHP. In contrast, the UPMHP had no statistically significant effect on outpatient mental health expenditures or visits. There was no significant effect of the UPMHP on overall mental health expenditures.
本文考察了一项心理健康专项计划——犹他州预付心理健康计划(UPMHP),在1991年7月至1994年12月期间对医疗补助受益人的心理健康治疗支出及心理健康服务利用情况的影响。三家社区心理健康中心(CMHC)为其服务区域内的医疗补助受益人提供心理健康服务,以换取按人头支付的费用。该分析使用了医疗补助索赔数据以及UPMHP签约地点的“影子索赔”数据。分析是对支出和利用率进行前后比较,并在犹他州服务区域内选取了未参加UPMHP的同期对照组。结果表明,在UPMHP实施的前两年半时间里,该计划降低了医疗补助受益人的急性住院心理健康支出和住院率。相比之下,UPMHP对门诊心理健康支出或就诊次数没有统计学上的显著影响。UPMHP对总体心理健康支出没有显著影响。