Hunninghake D B
Heart Disease Prevention Clinic, The University of Minnesota, Minneapolis 55455, USA.
Am J Med. 1998 Feb 23;104(2A):9S-13S. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(98)00040-0.
Hypercholesterolemia, particularly an elevated level of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, is an unarguably established risk factor for coronary artery disease (CAD). It is equally well established that lowering LDL cholesterol levels will decrease CAD-related morbidity and mortality in patients with established CAD. Although lipid-lowering therapy is known to retard the progression of atherosclerosis in patients with native coronary arteries, its effect in patients with coronary bypass grafts, which are particularly vulnerable to occlusion, is less well understood. Moreover, whereas several major clinical trials have documented the benefits of lowering LDL cholesterol in a variety of patient subpopulations, there has been far less clarity surrounding the question of whether aggressive lowering of LDL cholesterol is of greater benefit than moderate lowering of LDL cholesterol. The Post Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (Post-CABG) trial, a multicenter, randomized, double-blind clinical trial comprising 1,351 patients with elevated levels of LDL cholesterol and a history of bypass surgery was designed to determine whether aggressive lowering of LDL cholesterol levels with therapy based on 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors ("statins") is more effective than moderate lowering in delaying the progression of atherosclerosis in bypass grafts. Quantitative computer-assisted angiography was conducted at baseline and again at an average of 4.3 years. The primary angiographic outcome was the mean percentage per patient of grafts with a decrease of > or = 0.6 mm in lumen diameter. Patients who received aggressive therapy were significantly more likely than their moderate-treatment counterparts to achieve and maintain LDL cholesterol levels within the National Cholesterol Education Program's (NCEP's) recommended target of < or = 100 mg/dL (< or = 2.59 mmol/L). Moreover, the mean percentage of grafts with progression of atherosclerosis was 27% for aggressively treated patients, compared with 39% for those who were randomized to the moderate-treatment group (p < 0.001). This study demonstrates that aggressive lipid lowering is practical and worthwhile in at-risk patients. Aggressive treatment is far more effective than moderate treatment in lowering LDL cholesterol levels to the NCEP target level of < or = 100 mg/dL (< or = 2.59 mmol/L), and this intervention decreases the progression of atherosclerosis.
高胆固醇血症,尤其是低密度脂蛋白(LDL)胆固醇水平升高,无疑是已确定的冠状动脉疾病(CAD)风险因素。同样确定的是,降低LDL胆固醇水平将降低已患CAD患者的CAD相关发病率和死亡率。尽管已知降脂治疗可延缓原发性冠状动脉疾病患者的动脉粥样硬化进展,但其在冠状动脉搭桥患者中的效果却鲜为人知,而冠状动脉搭桥患者尤其易发生血管闭塞。此外,虽然几项主要临床试验已证明在各种患者亚组中降低LDL胆固醇的益处,但对于积极降低LDL胆固醇是否比适度降低LDL胆固醇更有益这一问题,仍远未明确。冠状动脉搭桥术后(Post-CABG)试验是一项多中心、随机、双盲临床试验,纳入了1351例LDL胆固醇水平升高且有搭桥手术史的患者,旨在确定基于3-羟基-3-甲基戊二酰辅酶A(HMG-CoA)还原酶抑制剂(“他汀类药物”)的治疗积极降低LDL胆固醇水平在延缓搭桥血管动脉粥样硬化进展方面是否比适度降低更有效。在基线时以及平均4.3年后再次进行定量计算机辅助血管造影。主要血管造影结果是每位患者管腔直径减少≥0.6 mm的移植物的平均百分比。接受积极治疗的患者比接受适度治疗的患者更有可能达到并维持LDL胆固醇水平在国家胆固醇教育计划(NCEP)推荐的目标值≤100 mg/dL(≤2.59 mmol/L)以内。此外,积极治疗患者的动脉粥样硬化进展的移植物平均百分比为27%,而随机分配到适度治疗组的患者为39%(p<0.001)。这项研究表明,积极降脂在高危患者中是可行且值得的。积极治疗在将LDL胆固醇水平降低至NCEP目标水平≤100 mg/dL(≤2.59 mmol/L)方面远比适度治疗有效,并且这种干预可减少动脉粥样硬化的进展。