McLean S G, Myers P T, Neal R J, Walters M R
Department of Human Movement Studies, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Bull Hosp Jt Dis. 1998;57(1):30-8.
This study accurately quantifies the knee joint kinematics associated with sidestep cutting maneuvers in vivo. These data were subsequently evaluated to determine the relationship between sidestep cutting and non-contact anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury. Sixteen male subjects, proficient in the sidestep cutting maneuver, had knee joint kinematic data recorded during the stance phase of straight line running and sidestep cutting. Cutting speeds (5.5 msec-1 to 7.0 msec-1) and angles (30 degrees to 55 degrees) were chosen to reflect the sporting context. All subjects underwent medical screening prior to testing to ensure data represented joint biomechanics of healthy, ACL intact individuals. The temporal three dimensional positions of externally mounted (skin) markers were submitted to a custom software package (JTMOTION), which described in clinically meaningful terms, movements for the three rotational degrees of freedom at the knee joint. While mean patterns of motion for the three clinical knee rotations compared favorably between running and cutting data, sidestepping induced significantly (p < 0.01) greater maximum knee joint rotations during stance. Knee joint rotational ranges were also found to be significantly (p < 0.01) larger during cutting when compared to running. Increases in knee joint kinematics during cutting however, were not of a great enough magnitude to alone elicit spontaneous non-contact ACL injury, falling well within "safe" ranges of knee motion. Significant increases in inter-trial variability for the three rotations were observed in some subjects for sidestepping compared to running. It was concluded that a lack of consistency in knee joint biomechanics between cutting maneuvers increased the risk of ACL injury with the performance of an abnormal and potentially hazardous sidestep being more likely. The risk of non-contact ACL injury during cutting maneuvers was suggested to increase further when an individual displayed these "atypical" joint biomechanics in conjunction with specific joint structures, levels of experience and conditioning, and ligament morphologies.
本研究准确量化了体内侧步切入动作相关的膝关节运动学。随后对这些数据进行评估,以确定侧步切入与非接触性前交叉韧带(ACL)损伤之间的关系。16名熟练掌握侧步切入动作的男性受试者,在直线跑步和侧步切入的站立阶段记录了膝关节运动学数据。选择切入速度(5.5米/秒至7.0米/秒)和角度(30度至55度)以反映运动场景。所有受试者在测试前均接受医学筛查,以确保数据代表健康、ACL完整个体的关节生物力学。外部安装(皮肤)标记物的时间三维位置被提交到一个定制软件包(JTMOTION),该软件包用临床有意义的术语描述了膝关节三个旋转自由度的运动。虽然跑步和切入数据之间三种临床膝关节旋转的平均运动模式比较良好,但侧步在站立期间引起的最大膝关节旋转明显更大(p < 0.01)。与跑步相比,切入时膝关节旋转范围也明显更大(p < 0.01)。然而,切入时膝关节运动学的增加幅度不足以单独引发自发性非接触性ACL损伤,仍处于膝关节运动的“安全”范围内。与跑步相比,一些受试者在侧步时观察到三种旋转的试验间变异性显著增加。得出的结论是,切入动作之间膝关节生物力学缺乏一致性增加了ACL损伤的风险,更有可能出现异常且潜在危险的侧步。当个体表现出这些“非典型”关节生物力学,同时伴有特定的关节结构、经验水平和身体状况以及韧带形态时,切入动作期间非接触性ACL损伤的风险被认为会进一步增加。