• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

种植体基台就位的影像学验证。

Radiographic verification of implant abutment seating.

作者信息

Cameron S M, Joyce A, Brousseau J S, Parker M H

机构信息

Maxillofacial Prosthetics/Dental Oncology, U.S. Army Dental Activity, Fort Gordon, Ga., USA.

出版信息

J Prosthet Dent. 1998 Mar;79(3):298-303. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(98)70241-0.

DOI:10.1016/s0022-3913(98)70241-0
PMID:9553883
Abstract

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

It is possible to incorrectly seat an abutment on an external hex implant.

PURPOSE

This study investigated the theoretical and practical limits of radiographic verification of the complete seating of implant abutments on external hex implants.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A positioning device that could accurately place the film and/or tube head in any vertical relation desired relative to the implant and abutment was fabricated. For all records, a standard abutment was secured to the implant in both a fully seated position (closed) and with the abutment turned approximately 30 degrees and seated atop the implant external hex (open). Digital radiographs were made with the tube head fixed perpendicular to the implant and the film angled at 0, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, and 45 degrees. The film was then positioned parallel to the implant and the tube head was angled at 0, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, and 45 degrees. An image of each position was shown to 36 dentists and they were asked if the image was diagnostic for determining the status of the implant/abutment interface.

RESULTS

The data were analyzed with a computer statistics program. The group with the tube head changed was analyzed with the Cochran's Q test and revealed a statistically significant (p < 0.0001) change in the diagnostic value of radiographs beginning at 20 degrees. The group with the film angle changed was analyzed with a Pearson chi-square and showed no statistical difference (p = 0.394) for the diagnostic value of any of the film angles.

CONCLUSION

Maintaining the tube head to less than 20 degrees from perpendicular to the long axis of the implant resulted in a diagnostic radiograph, regardless of the angle of the film.

摘要

问题陈述

外部六角形种植体上的基台可能未正确就位。

目的

本研究调查了通过影像学检查验证外部六角形种植体上种植体基台完全就位的理论和实际限度。

材料与方法

制作了一种定位装置,该装置可将胶片和/或管头相对于种植体和基台精确放置在任何所需的垂直关系中。对于所有记录,将一个标准基台以完全就位位置(闭合)固定在种植体上,并将基台旋转约30度后放置在种植体外部六角形顶部(打开)。管头垂直于种植体固定,胶片倾斜0、5、10、15、20、25、30、35、40和45度拍摄数字化X线片。然后将胶片平行于种植体放置,管头倾斜0、5、10、15、20、25、30、35、40和45度。将每个位置的图像展示给36名牙医,并询问他们该图像是否有助于判断种植体/基台界面的状态。

结果

使用计算机统计程序对数据进行分析。对管头位置改变的组采用 Cochr an Q检验进行分析,结果显示从20度开始,X线片的诊断价值有统计学显著变化(p < 0.0001)。对胶片角度改变的组采用Pearson卡方检验进行分析,结果显示任何胶片角度的诊断价值均无统计学差异(p = 0.394)。

结论

管头与种植体长轴垂直方向的夹角保持在小于20度时,无论胶片角度如何,均可获得具有诊断价值的X线片。

相似文献

1
Radiographic verification of implant abutment seating.种植体基台就位的影像学验证。
J Prosthet Dent. 1998 Mar;79(3):298-303. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(98)70241-0.
2
Radiographical evaluation of the gap at the implant-abutment interface.种植体-基台界面间隙的影像学评估。
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2010 Aug;22(4):235-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2010.00345.x.
3
Tube angulation effect on radiographic analysis of the implant-abutment interface.根管角度对种植体-基台界面影像学分析的影响。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1999 Jan-Feb;14(1):77-85.
4
Accuracy of Digital Versus Conventional Periapical Radiographs to Detect Misfit at the Implant-Abutment Interface.数字根尖片与传统根尖片在检测种植体-基台界面不匹配方面的准确性。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016 Sep-Oct;31(5):1023-9. doi: 10.11607/jomi.4525.
5
A radiographic analysis of implant component misfit.种植体部件失配的放射学分析。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011 Jul-Aug;26(4):807-15.
6
Effect of Implant Connection Type and Depth on the Seating Accuracy of Hand-Tightened Abutments.种植体连接类型和深度对手动拧紧基台就位准确性的影响。
J Prosthodont. 2019 Feb;28(2):e661-e665. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12688. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
7
COMMENTARY. Radiographical evaluation of the gap at the implant-abutment interface.述评。种植体-基台界面间隙的影像学评估。
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2010 Aug;22(4):251. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2010.00346.x.
8
The abutment seating jig: a prosthodontic implant adjunct.基台就位导板:一种口腔修复种植辅助器械。
Implant Dent. 1997 Spring;6(1):14-6. doi: 10.1097/00008505-199700610-00003.
9
A classification system to measure the implant-abutment microgap.一种用于测量种植体-基台微间隙的分类系统。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007 Nov-Dec;22(6):879-85.
10
A 1-year clinical report of a one-piece implant abutment.
Int J Prosthodont. 2001 Mar-Apr;14(2):159-63.

引用本文的文献

1
Passive fit and time efficiency for prefabricated versus conventionally constructed cobalt chromium CAD\CAM 3-unit implant supported frameworks in free end saddle models: a pilot invitro study.预制与传统制作钴铬 CAD\CAM 三单位种植体支持支架在游离端鞍模型中的被动适合性和时间效率:一项初步的体外研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Oct 15;24(1):1225. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04950-y.
2
Dental Implant Abutment Screw Loss: Presentation of 10 Cases.牙种植体基台螺钉松动:10例病例报告
J Funct Biomater. 2024 Apr 9;15(4):96. doi: 10.3390/jfb15040096.
3
Using acrylic customized X-ray positioning stents for long-term follow-up studies.
使用丙烯酸定制的X射线定位支架进行长期随访研究。
Saudi Dent J. 2020 Mar;32(3):120-128. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2019.10.001. Epub 2019 Oct 15.
4
Assessing fit at the implant-abutment junction with a radiographic device that does not require access to the implant body.使用一种无需接触种植体主体的放射成像设备评估种植体-基台连接处的适配性。
J Prosthet Dent. 2014 Oct;112(4):817-23. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.03.016. Epub 2014 May 14.
5
Implant adaptation of stock abutments versus CAD/CAM abutments: a radiographic and Scanning Electron Microscopy study.成品基台与计算机辅助设计/计算机辅助制造(CAD/CAM)基台的种植体适配性:一项影像学和扫描电子显微镜研究。
Ann Stomatol (Roma). 2010 Jul;1(3-4):9-13. Epub 2011 Feb 13.