Suppr超能文献

未来的疫苗是否需要佐剂?

Will adjuvants be needed for vaccines of the future?

作者信息

Bomford R

机构信息

Peptech (UK) Ltd., Cirencester Glos.

出版信息

Dev Biol Stand. 1998;92:13-7.

PMID:9554255
Abstract

Adjuvants improve the uptake of antigens by the immune system, and stimulate antigen-presenting cells (APC) to express "danger signals" such as the secretion of cytokines. The physical changes in antigen distribution can also be brought about by DNA vaccines, which provide persistent antigenic stimulation, access to the endogenous antigen processing pathway and, with the appropriate mode of injection, targeting to APC; however the question of whether DNA vaccines induce danger signals is unresolved. This presentation reviews the particular features of the adjuvant action of Al(OH)3, muramyl dipeptides and saponins, and the danger signals they induce in APC to ascertain whether they provide clues as to how DNA vaccines might be improved. Three conclusions are drawn: (i) adjuvants differ in the relative efficacy with which they stimulate Th1 and Th2 cells; (ii) IL-1 is the only identified common danger signal induced by the three adjuvants; (iii) in the case of both muramyl dipeptides and saponins there are toxic and nontoxic analogues, and the adjuvant activity can be separated from the toxicity. The basis of the difference between the toxic and non-toxic analogues is not clear.

摘要

佐剂可提高免疫系统对抗原的摄取,并刺激抗原呈递细胞(APC)表达“危险信号”,如细胞因子的分泌。DNA疫苗也可引起抗原分布的物理变化,它能提供持续的抗原刺激,进入内源性抗原加工途径,并且通过适当的注射方式靶向APC;然而,DNA疫苗是否能诱导危险信号这一问题尚未得到解决。本报告回顾了氢氧化铝、胞壁酰二肽和皂苷的佐剂作用的特殊特征,以及它们在APC中诱导的危险信号,以确定它们是否能为改进DNA疫苗提供线索。得出了三个结论:(i)佐剂在刺激Th1和Th2细胞的相对效力上存在差异;(ii)白细胞介素-1是这三种佐剂诱导产生的唯一已确定的共同危险信号;(iii)就胞壁酰二肽和皂苷而言,都存在有毒和无毒类似物,且佐剂活性可与毒性分离。有毒和无毒类似物之间差异的基础尚不清楚。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验