• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用模式分析预测重度抑郁症缓解患者在接受氟西汀或安慰剂治疗1年期间的差异性复发情况。

Use of pattern analysis to predict differential relapse of remitted patients with major depression during 1 year of treatment with fluoxetine or placebo.

作者信息

Stewart J W, Quitkin F M, McGrath P J, Amsterdam J, Fava M, Fawcett J, Reimherr F, Rosenbaum J, Beasley C, Roback P

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, USA.

出版信息

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1998 Apr;55(4):334-43. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.55.4.334.

DOI:10.1001/archpsyc.55.4.334
PMID:9554429
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Delayed and persistent ("true drug") improvement characterizes the response to antidepressant medication. Early or nonpersistent ("placebo") benefit is typical of a placebo response. The prediction was that patients with a true drug response would sustain their benefit best if they continued to receive the drug and that patients with a placebo response would have an equivalent prognosis whether they continued to receive the drug or were switched to placebo.

METHODS

Patients with major depression who met the study's response criteria (a modified Hamilton Depression Rating Scale score < or =7 and failure to meet major depression criteria after each of the last 3 weeks following 12 to 14 weeks of treatment with fluoxetine hydrochloride, 20 mg/d) were enrolled in a 50-week randomized placebo substitution trial during which the return of depressive symptoms defined relapse. The timing and persistency of response during initial treatment defined true drug or placebo response patterns.

RESULTS

Patients with a true drug response pattern relapsed significantly more frequently if they were switched to placebo than if they continued to receive fluoxetine (P<.001 for weeks 12-26, P<.005 for weeks 26-50, and P<.41 for weeks 50-62). Patients with a placebo response pattern had an equivalent outcome whether maintained on fluoxetine therapy or placebo (P< .20 for weeks 12-26, test invalid for weeks 26-50, and P<.67 for weeks 50-62). Patients with a placebo response pattern relapsed more often when they continued to receive fluoxetine than patients with a true drug response pattern (P<.01 for weeks 12-26, P<.10 for weeks 26-50, and P<.36 for weeks 50-62).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings confirm that pattern analysis validly differentiates true drug from nonspecific initial responses and extend its use to the continuation and maintenance phases of treatment for depression. Investigations into the mechanisms of antidepressant activity might best be limited to those that can account for delayed efficacy. Fluoxetine's efficacy during the continuation and maintenance phases of treatment may be limited to patients with a true drug pattern of initial response.

摘要

背景

延迟且持续(“真正的药物”)改善是对抗抑郁药物反应的特征。早期或非持续性(“安慰剂”)获益是安慰剂反应的典型表现。预测是具有真正药物反应的患者如果继续接受药物治疗,其获益维持得最好;而具有安慰剂反应的患者,无论继续接受药物治疗还是换用安慰剂,其预后相当。

方法

符合研究反应标准(使用20mg/d盐酸氟西汀治疗12至14周后,改良汉密尔顿抑郁量表评分≤7且在最后3周的每一周均不符合重度抑郁标准)的重度抑郁症患者参加了一项为期50周的随机安慰剂替代试验,在此期间抑郁症状的复发定义为病情复发。初始治疗期间反应的时间和持续性定义了真正的药物或安慰剂反应模式。

结果

具有真正药物反应模式的患者,如果换用安慰剂,其复发频率显著高于继续接受氟西汀治疗的患者(第12 - 26周P<0.001,第26 - 50周P<0.005,第50 - 62周P<0.41)。具有安慰剂反应模式的患者,无论维持氟西汀治疗还是使用安慰剂,其结果相当(第12 - 26周P<0.20,第26 - 50周检验无效,第50 - 62周P<0.67)。具有安慰剂反应模式的患者继续接受氟西汀治疗时,比具有真正药物反应模式的患者复发更频繁(第12 - 26周P<0.01,第26 - 50周P<0.10,第50 - 62周P<0.36)。

结论

这些发现证实模式分析能有效区分真正的药物反应与非特异性初始反应,并将其应用扩展至抑郁症治疗的延续和维持阶段。对抗抑郁活性机制的研究可能最好局限于那些能解释延迟疗效的机制。氟西汀在治疗延续和维持阶段的疗效可能仅限于具有真正药物初始反应模式的患者。

相似文献

1
Use of pattern analysis to predict differential relapse of remitted patients with major depression during 1 year of treatment with fluoxetine or placebo.使用模式分析预测重度抑郁症缓解患者在接受氟西汀或安慰剂治疗1年期间的差异性复发情况。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1998 Apr;55(4):334-43. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.55.4.334.
2
Placebo-controlled continuation treatment with mirtazapine: acute pattern of response predicts relapse.
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2004 May;29(5):1012-8. doi: 10.1038/sj.npp.1300405.
3
A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of fluoxetine in children and adolescents with depression.一项针对患有抑郁症的儿童和青少年的氟西汀双盲、随机、安慰剂对照试验。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1997 Nov;54(11):1031-7. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1997.01830230069010.
4
Predictors of relapse during fluoxetine continuation or maintenance treatment of major depression.氟西汀持续或维持治疗重度抑郁症期间复发的预测因素。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2000 Jul;61(7):518-24. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v61n0710.
5
Efficacy and safety of fluoxetine in treating bipolar II major depressive episode.氟西汀治疗双相II型重度抑郁发作的疗效与安全性。
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 1998 Dec;18(6):435-40. doi: 10.1097/00004714-199812000-00003.
6
Optimal length of continuation therapy in depression: a prospective assessment during long-term fluoxetine treatment.抑郁症持续治疗的最佳时长:长期氟西汀治疗期间的前瞻性评估
Am J Psychiatry. 1998 Sep;155(9):1247-53. doi: 10.1176/ajp.155.9.1247.
7
A randomized double-blind study of fluoxetine versus placebo in the treatment of dysthymia.氟西汀与安慰剂治疗心境恶劣障碍的随机双盲研究。
Am J Psychiatry. 1993 Aug;150(8):1169-75. doi: 10.1176/ajp.150.8.1169.
8
How long to onset of antidepressant action: a meta-analysis of patients treated with fluoxetine or placebo.
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 1994 Winter;9(4):245-50. doi: 10.1097/00004850-199400940-00003.
9
Effect of pindolol in hastening response to fluoxetine in the treatment of major depression: a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.吲哚洛尔在加速氟西汀治疗重度抑郁症反应中的作用:一项双盲、安慰剂对照试验。
Am J Psychiatry. 1997 Jan;154(1):37-43. doi: 10.1176/ajp.154.1.37.
10
Pattern analysis of antidepressant response to fluoxetine.氟西汀抗抑郁反应的模式分析
J Clin Psychiatry. 1986 Nov;47(11):560-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Individual deviations from normative electroencephalographic connectivity predict antidepressant response.个体在脑电图连通性上偏离常态可预测抗抑郁反应。
J Affect Disord. 2024 Apr 15;351:220-230. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2024.01.177. Epub 2024 Jan 27.
2
Low predictive power of clinical features for relapse prediction after antidepressant discontinuation in a naturalistic setting.在自然环境中,临床特征对抗抑郁药停药后复发的预测能力较低。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jul 1;12(1):11171. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-13893-9.
3
Optimal partitioning for the proportional hazards model.
比例风险模型的最优分割
J Appl Stat. 2020 Nov 18;49(4):968-987. doi: 10.1080/02664763.2020.1846690. eCollection 2022.
4
Predictive values of tumor necrosis factor-α for depression treatment outcomes: effect modification by hazardous alcohol consumption.肿瘤坏死因子-α对抑郁症治疗结局的预测价值:危险饮酒的作用修饰。
Transl Psychiatry. 2021 Sep 2;11(1):450. doi: 10.1038/s41398-021-01581-7.
5
Extracting scalar measures from functional data with applications to placebo response.从功能数据中提取标量测度及其在安慰剂反应中的应用。
Stat Interface. 2021;14(3):255-265. doi: 10.4310/20-sii633.
6
Approaches for discontinuation versus continuation of long-term antidepressant use for depressive and anxiety disorders in adults.成人抑郁和焦虑障碍中长效抗抑郁药停药与继续使用的方法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 15;4(4):CD013495. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013495.pub2.
7
Symptom trajectories in patients with panic disorder in a primary care intervention: Results from a randomized controlled trial (PARADISE).在初级保健干预中惊恐障碍患者的症状轨迹:一项随机对照试验(PARADISE)的结果。
Sci Rep. 2019 May 9;9(1):7170. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-43487-x.
8
LATENT CLASS MODELING USING MATRIX COVARIATES WITH APPLICATION TO IDENTIFYING EARLY PLACEBO RESPONDERS BASED ON EEG SIGNALS.使用矩阵协变量的潜在类别建模及其在基于脑电图信号识别早期安慰剂反应者中的应用
Ann Appl Stat. 2017 Sep;11(3):1513-1536. doi: 10.1214/17-AOAS1044. Epub 2017 Oct 5.
9
Predicting relapse after antidepressant withdrawal - a systematic review.预测抗抑郁药撤药后的复发——一项系统评价。
Psychol Med. 2017 Feb;47(3):426-437. doi: 10.1017/S0033291716002580. Epub 2016 Oct 27.
10
The role of patient expectancy in placebo and nocebo effects in antidepressant trials.患者预期在抗抑郁试验中安慰剂和反安慰剂效应中的作用。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2014 Oct;75(10):1040-6. doi: 10.4088/JCP.13m08797.