Mira J J, Llinás G, Gil V, Orozco D, Palazón I, Vitaller J
Departamento de Psicología de la Salud, Universidad de Alicante.
Aten Primaria. 1998 Jan;21(1):14-22.
To elaborate and validate a questionnaire for identifying common styles of Primary Care doctors' practice.
Primary Health Care. Public sector in Spain.
This was a study to validate a questionnaire administered in two phases with different samples. In the first phase, the items (item-total correlation, using Alpha on eliminating item), validity of construction, empirical validity and internal consistency, were analysed. In the second, discriminatory validity and reliability of the questionnaire (test-retest) were calculated.
81.5% of the doctors replied in the first phase; and 100% in the second. Two factors were isolated with the Principal Components procedure, which confirmed the validity of the questionnaire's construction (52% variance explained). Internal consistency (Alphas ranged between 0.55 and 0.75) and reliability (ranging between 0.50 and 0.95 in function of the time elapsed) were also demonstrated.
This instrument could be used to differentiate two styles in practice, characterised by focusing on the physical illness vs the psycho-social aspects of the disease process. The instrument is also useful because it gives the feeling of control over the task.
精心设计并验证一份用于识别初级保健医生常见诊疗风格的问卷。
初级卫生保健。西班牙公共部门。
本研究分两个阶段、针对不同样本对一份问卷进行验证。第一阶段,分析各条目(条目与总分的相关性,采用删除条目后的α系数)、结构效度、实证效度和内部一致性。第二阶段,计算问卷的区分效度和重测信度。
81.5%的医生在第一阶段做出回复;第二阶段为100%。通过主成分分析法分离出两个因素,证实了问卷结构的效度(解释了52%的方差)。还证明了内部一致性(α系数在0.55至0.75之间)和信度(根据时间间隔,信度在0.50至0.95之间)。
该工具可用于区分两种诊疗风格,其特点是一种侧重于身体疾病,另一种侧重于疾病过程的心理社会方面。该工具也很有用,因为它能让人产生对任务的掌控感。