Suppr超能文献

医生赋能技能问卷:一种新开发的初级卫生保健工具的验证

Physician Enabling Skills Questionnaire: Validation of a newly developed instrument in primary health care.

作者信息

Hudon Catherine, Lambert Mireille, Almirall José

出版信息

Can Fam Physician. 2015 Nov;61(11):e517-23.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the reliability and validity of the newly developed Physician Enabling Skills Questionnaire (PESQ) by assessing its internal consistency, test-retest reliability, concurrent validity with patient-centred care, and predictive validity with patient activation and patient enablement.

DESIGN

Validation study.

SETTING

Saguenay, Que.

PARTICIPANTS

One hundred patients with at least 1 chronic disease who presented in a waiting room of a regional health centre family medicine unit.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Family physicians' enabling skills, measured with the PESQ at 2 points in time (ie, while in the waiting room at the family medicine unit and 2 weeks later through a mail survey); patient-centred care, assessed with the Patient Perception of Patient-Centredness instrument; patient activation, assessed with the Patient Activation Measure; and patient enablement, assessed with the Patient Enablement Instrument.

RESULTS

The internal consistency of the 6 subscales of the PESQ was adequate (Cronbach α = .69 to .92). The test-retest reliability was very good (r = 0.90; 95% CI 0.84 to 0.93). Concurrent validity with the Patient Perception of Patient-Centredness instrument was good (r = -0.67; 95% CI -0.78 to -0.53; P < .001). The PESQ accounts for 11% of the total variance with the Patient Activation Measure (r² = 0.11; P = .002) and 19% of the variance with the Patient Enablement Instrument (r² = 0.19; P < .001).

CONCLUSION

The newly developed PESQ presents good psychometric properties, allowing for its use in practice and research.

摘要

目的

通过评估新开发的医生赋能技能问卷(PESQ)的内部一致性、重测信度、与以患者为中心的护理的同时效度以及与患者激活和患者赋能的预测效度,来评价其可靠性和有效性。

设计

效度研究。

地点

魁北克省萨格奈。

参与者

100名患有至少1种慢性病的患者,他们在地区健康中心家庭医学科的候诊室就诊。

主要观察指标

用PESQ在两个时间点测量家庭医生的赋能技能(即在家庭医学科候诊室时以及2周后通过邮寄调查);用患者对以患者为中心的感知工具评估以患者为中心的护理;用患者激活量表评估患者激活;用患者赋能工具评估患者赋能。

结果

PESQ的6个分量表的内部一致性良好(克朗巴赫α系数=0.69至0.92)。重测信度非常好(r = 0.90;95%可信区间0.84至0.93)。与患者对以患者为中心的感知工具的同时效度良好(r = -0.67;95%可信区间-0.78至-0.53;P <.001)。PESQ在患者激活量表中占总方差的11%(r² = 0.11;P =.002),在患者赋能工具中占方差的19%(r² = 0.19;P <.001)。

结论

新开发的PESQ具有良好的心理测量学特性,可用于实践和研究。

相似文献

5
Validation of the Family Meeting Behavioral Skills Checklist. An Instrument to Assess Fellows' Communication Skills.
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016 Aug;13(8):1388-93. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201601-021OC.
6
Validation of the Turkish version of the Quebec back pain disability scale for patients with low back pain.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Mar 15;34(6):E219-24. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181971e2d.
8
Person-centred climate questionnaire (PCQ-S): establishing reliability and cut-off scores in residential aged care.
J Nurs Manag. 2015 Apr;23(3):315-23. doi: 10.1111/jonm.12132. Epub 2013 Jul 23.
9
Validation of the measure of processes of care for adults: a measure of client-centred care.
Int J Qual Health Care. 2010 Aug;22(4):302-9. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzq031. Epub 2010 Jun 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Kindness: Definitions and a pilot study for the development of a kindness scale in healthcare.
PLoS One. 2023 Jul 19;18(7):e0288766. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288766. eCollection 2023.
4
[Questionnaires of person centered care in primary care. A systematic review].
Aten Primaria. 2020 Dec;52(10):738-749. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2019.11.004. Epub 2019 Dec 26.

本文引用的文献

1
Family physician enabling attitudes: a qualitative study of patient perceptions.
BMC Fam Pract. 2013 Jan 10;14:8. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-14-8.
2
Patient-centered care in chronic disease management: a thematic analysis of the literature in family medicine.
Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Aug;88(2):170-6. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2012.01.009. Epub 2012 Feb 22.
3
Holding relationships in primary care: a qualitative exploration of doctors' and patients' perceptions.
Br J Gen Pract. 2011 Aug;61(589):e484-91. doi: 10.3399/bjgp11X588457.
6
Enablement in health care context: a concept analysis.
J Eval Clin Pract. 2011 Feb;17(1):143-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01413.x. Epub 2010 Sep 2.
7
Assessing enablement in clinical practice: a systematic review of available instruments.
J Eval Clin Pract. 2010 Dec;16(6):1301-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2009.01332.x. Epub 2010 Aug 19.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验