Garzón González G, Ortiz Marrón H, Lázaro Montero T, Martínez Galisteo M
Gerencia de Atención Primaria del Area 4 del INSALUD, Centro de Salud Dr. Cirajas, Madrid.
Aten Primaria. 1998 Jan;21(1):43-5.
An observational, cross-sectional study.
Primary Care Area 4, INSALUD, Madrid, covering 526,987 inhabitants.
The complaints presented at PC Centres during 1993 were included. Those presented for reasons not concerning the centre were excluded. In all, 448 complaints were studied.
Significant differences were found in the general index of complaints according to the care model. Statistically significant differences were detected between PCT and the TM for complaints due to disagreement with the treatment and disagreement with the follow-up procedures.
Since the indicators of prescription profiles and the following of procedures are better in PCTs than in the TM, perhaps patients should be encouraged to participate more in the taking of clinical decisions. This would help the introduction of improvements both in the technical quality of treatment and in the follow-up of chronic diseases to be perceived as such by patients. At present, as this study suggests, they are causes of greater dissatisfaction.
一项观察性横断面研究。
马德里INSALUD的第4初级保健区,覆盖526,987名居民。
纳入1993年在初级保健中心提出的投诉。排除那些因与中心无关的原因而提出的投诉。共研究了448起投诉。
根据护理模式,在投诉总体指标上发现了显著差异。在因对治疗和后续程序存在分歧而导致的投诉方面,检测到PCT和TM之间存在统计学上的显著差异。
由于PCTs在处方概况和程序遵循方面的指标优于TM,或许应鼓励患者更多地参与临床决策。这将有助于在治疗技术质量和慢性病随访方面引入改进措施,使患者能够切实感受到这些改进。目前,正如本研究所示,它们是导致更大不满的原因。