Celli P, Fruin A, Cervoni L
Dipartimento di Scienze Neurologiche, Università degli Studi di Roma La Sapienza.
Minerva Chir. 1997 Dec;52(12):1467-80.
A series of 72 severely head injured patients are reported, 24 (33%) with surgical intracranial hematomas. All patients were intensively cared for under the same therapeutic regime; intracranial pressure (ICP) was monitored and treated if increased. The series mortality was 39%. Uncontrollable increase of ICP (UI-ICP), always fatal, was observed in 18% of patients and in 13 of 28 deaths (46%); the incidence of UI-ICP among deaths was higher in patients less than in those more than 40 years old (55% vs 25%). Patients with UI-ICP were frequently deeply comatose and with arterial hypotension on admission; almost all died in the first days. Patients directly admitted from the scene with well staffed Life Flight Helicopter Emergency Care compared with those directly admitted from the scene with different type of ambulance service (paramedics, police, firemen and private) had a mortality rate significantly less (20% vs 54%) and an incidence of UI-ICP strongly lower both among patients (5% vs 29%) and among deaths (25% vs 54%). Thus in this small series intensive care after admission was not effective to obtain good results if patients had received poor preadmission emergency care. Review of the literature on main clinical predictors of outcome in severe head injury, have made possible some observations. Ischemic and intracranial hypertension brain lesions were generally present in patients killed by head trauma; while diffuse axonal injury, frequently responsible for vegetative, severe disability survival and late deaths, was observed only in 20-30% of postmortem examinations. Old age, poor neurological status and cardiocirculatory and respiratory disturbances prior to and upon admission positively worsened the outcome, while intracranial hematomas had a more variable predictive value. Intracranial hypertension was a definitively ominous predictor only if very high when the risk to be or become uncontrollable seems to be much elevated. UI-ICP, often fatal despite any aggressive therapy, was the single most frequent killer after severe head injury, responsible for about half of all deaths after admission. The different outcome among severe head injury series could be conceivably related to a different frequency of UI-ICP. Besides the severity of head injury and delay and mode of admission, we suggest that preadmission respiratory and cardiocirculatory and the quality of emergency medical system could strongly affect the incidence of uncontrollable increase of ICP in admitted patients and thus the mortality rate and favorable recovery of the series. The advanced preadmission emergency care service with intensive care after admission could significantly explain the better results often observed in severe head injury series.
报告了一组72例重度颅脑损伤患者,其中24例(33%)有颅内手术血肿。所有患者均在相同的治疗方案下接受重症监护;监测颅内压(ICP),若升高则进行治疗。该组患者的死亡率为39%。18%的患者出现无法控制的颅内压升高(UI - ICP),这往往是致命的,在28例死亡患者中有13例(46%)出现;小于40岁患者死亡中UI - ICP的发生率高于大于40岁的患者(55%对25%)。出现UI - ICP的患者入院时常常深度昏迷且伴有动脉低血压;几乎所有患者在最初几天内死亡。与由不同类型救护车服务(护理人员、警察、消防员和私人车辆)直接从现场送来的患者相比,由配备完善的生命飞行直升机紧急医疗服务直接从现场送来的患者死亡率显著更低(20%对54%),患者中以及死亡患者中UI - ICP的发生率也低得多(5%对29%以及25%对54%)。因此,在这个小样本系列研究中,如果患者入院前接受的紧急医疗护理较差,入院后的重症监护并不能有效取得良好结果。回顾关于重度颅脑损伤预后主要临床预测指标的文献后,得出了一些观察结果。因颅脑外伤死亡的患者中通常存在缺血性和颅内高压性脑损伤;而弥漫性轴索损伤常导致植物状态、严重残疾存活和晚期死亡,仅在20% - 30%的尸检中观察到。老年、入院前和入院时神经状态差以及心血管和呼吸功能紊乱会使预后明显变差,而颅内血肿的预测价值更具变异性。颅内高压只有在非常高时才是明确的不祥预测指标,此时其失控的风险似乎会大幅升高。UI - ICP尽管采取任何积极治疗往往仍致命,是重度颅脑损伤后最常见的单一杀手,约占入院后所有死亡人数的一半。重度颅脑损伤系列研究中不同的预后可能与UI - ICP的不同发生率有关。除了颅脑损伤的严重程度、入院延迟和方式外,我们认为入院前的呼吸和心血管功能以及紧急医疗系统的质量会强烈影响入院患者中无法控制的颅内压升高的发生率,进而影响该组患者的死亡率和良好恢复情况。入院前先进的紧急医疗护理服务加上入院后的重症监护可以显著解释重度颅脑损伤系列研究中常常观察到的更好结果。