• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

管理式医疗前后心理健康服务的成本与使用情况。

Costs and use of mental health services before and after managed care.

作者信息

Goldman W, McCulloch J, Sturm R

机构信息

University of California, San Francisco, USA.

出版信息

Health Aff (Millwood). 1998 Mar-Apr;17(2):40-52. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.17.2.40.

DOI:10.1377/hlthaff.17.2.40
PMID:9558784
Abstract

This paper tracks access, utilization, and costs of mental health care for a private employer over nine years during which mental health benefits were carved out of the medical plan and managed care was introduced. Prior to the carve-out, mental health costs increased by around 30 percent annually; in the first year after the change, costs dropped by more than 40 percent; in the six follow-up years, costs continued to decline slowly. This cost reduction was not attributable to decreased initial access, as the number of persons using any mental health care increased following the change. Instead, the cost reduction was the result of (1) fewer outpatient sessions per user, (2) reduced probability of an inpatient admission, (3) reduced length-of-stay for an inpatient episode, and (4) substantially lower costs per unit of service.

摘要

本文追踪了一家私人雇主在九年间的心理健康护理的可及性、利用率和成本情况,在此期间,心理健康福利从医疗保险计划中分离出来,并引入了管理式医疗。在分离之前,心理健康成本每年增长约30%;在变革后的第一年,成本下降了40%以上;在随后的六年里,成本继续缓慢下降。这种成本降低并非归因于初始可及性的降低,因为变革后使用任何心理健康护理的人数有所增加。相反,成本降低是以下因素的结果:(1)每位用户的门诊次数减少;(2)住院收治的可能性降低;(3)住院期间的住院时长缩短;(4)每单位服务的成本大幅降低。

相似文献

1
Costs and use of mental health services before and after managed care.管理式医疗前后心理健康服务的成本与使用情况。
Health Aff (Millwood). 1998 Mar-Apr;17(2):40-52. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.17.2.40.
2
Shifting to outpatient care? Mental health care use and cost under private insurance.转向门诊护理?私人保险下的心理健康护理使用情况与成本
Am J Psychiatry. 1999 Aug;156(8):1250-7. doi: 10.1176/ajp.156.8.1250.
3
Costs and incentives in a behavioral health carve-out.行为健康独立核算中的成本与激励措施。
Health Aff (Millwood). 1998 Mar-Apr;17(2):53-69. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.17.2.53.
4
The impacts of mental health parity and managed care in one large employer group.心理健康平价法案与管理式医疗在一个大型雇主群体中的影响。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2002 May-Jun;21(3):148-59. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.21.3.148.
5
Seeking sane solutions: managing mental health and chemical dependency costs.寻求合理的解决方案:管理心理健康和药物依赖成本。
Empl Benefits J. 1991 Sep;16(3):31-5, 40.
6
How does risk sharing between employers and a managed behavioral health organization affect mental health care?雇主与管理式行为健康组织之间的风险分担如何影响心理健康护理?
Health Serv Res. 2000 Oct;35(4):761-76.
7
Mental health carve-outs: effects and implications.心理健康专项条款:影响与启示
Med Care Res Rev. 1999;56 Suppl 2:37-59.
8
Mental health carve-outs.心理健康专项条款
Health Aff (Millwood). 1998 Jul-Aug;17(4):243-4. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.17.4.243-a.
9
Issues of quality and consumer rights in the health care market.医疗保健市场中的质量问题和消费者权益问题。
EBRI Issue Brief. 1998 Apr(196):1-27.
10
Psychiatric inpatient, outpatient, and medication utilization and costs among privately insured youths, 1997-2000.1997 - 2000年私人保险青少年的精神科住院、门诊、用药情况及费用
Am J Psychiatry. 2003 Apr;160(4):757-64. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.160.4.757.

引用本文的文献

1
PERSPECTIVE: Health Economic Interests at NIMH and NIDA to Improve Delivery of Behavioral Health Services.观点:NIMH 和 NIDA 的健康经济利益在于改善行为健康服务的提供。
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2024 Mar 1;27(1):33-39.
2
The Impact of Demographic, Clinical, and Institutional Factors on Psychiatric Inpatient Length-of-Stay.人口统计学、临床及机构因素对精神科住院患者住院时长的影响
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2021 Jul;48(4):683-694. doi: 10.1007/s10488-020-01104-4. Epub 2021 Jan 1.
3
Psychiatric Disorders and Trends in Resource Use in Pediatric Hospitals.
儿科医院中的精神疾病与资源使用趋势
Pediatrics. 2016 Nov;138(5). doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-0909.
4
Institutions, Politics, and Mental Health Parity.机构、政治与心理健康平价
Soc Ment Health. 2012 Nov 1;2(3). doi: 10.1177/2156869312455436.
5
State parity laws and access to treatment for substance use disorder in the United States: implications for federal parity legislation.美国的州平等法律和物质使用障碍治疗的可及性:对联邦平等立法的影响。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2013 Dec;70(12):1355-62. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.2169.
6
Examining Outcomes of Acute Psychiatric Hospitalization among Children.儿童急性精神病住院治疗结果研究。
Soc Work Ment Health. 2012;10(3):205-232. doi: 10.1080/15332985.2011.628602.
7
The role of provider supply and organization in reducing racial/ethnic disparities in mental health care in the U.S.医疗服务提供者数量和组织在减少美国心理健康服务中的种族/民族差异方面的作用
Soc Sci Med. 2013 May;84:102-9. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.02.006. Epub 2013 Feb 13.
8
A political history of federal mental health and addiction insurance parity.联邦精神健康和成瘾保险平权的政治历史。
Milbank Q. 2010 Sep;88(3):404-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2010.00605.x.
9
Behavioral health services for women who have breast cancer.为患有乳腺癌的女性提供的行为健康服务。
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Feb 10;27(5):706-12. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.16.3006. Epub 2008 Dec 29.
10
Time trends and predictors of suicide among mental health outpatients in the Department of Veterans Affairs.美国退伍军人事务部心理健康门诊患者自杀的时间趋势及预测因素
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2008 Jan;35(1):115-24. doi: 10.1007/s11414-007-9092-0. Epub 2007 Nov 8.