Berge M, Munir A K, Dreborg S
Department of Paediatrics, University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden.
Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 1998 Feb;9(1):25-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3038.1998.tb00296.x.
To investigate whether our hypothesis that cat and dog owners bring allergens to public areas in their clothes was true or not, we studied the levels of Fel d1, Can f1, Der p1 and Der f1 in dust from the clothes and classrooms of children in a Swedish school. We also investigated the levels of allergen in different areas in the four classrooms used by the children. Thirty-one children were selected in four classes, forming three groups: cat owners, dog owners and children without a cat or dog at home. Furthermore, a group of children with asthma was included. Cat and dog allergens were detected in all 57 samples from clothes and classrooms. Mite allergen Der f1 was detected in low concentrations in 6 out of 48 and Der p1 in 5 out of 46 samples investigated. The concentrations of Can f1 were higher than those of Fel d1 in samples from clothes (geometric mean: 2676 ng/g fine dust and 444 ng/g) and classrooms (Can f1: 1092 ng/g, Fel d1: 240 ng/g). The dog owners had significantly higher concentrations of Can f1 (8434 ng/g fine dust) in their clothes than cat owners (1629 ng/g, p < 0.01), children without cat or dog (2742 ng/g, p < 0.05) and children with asthma (1518 ng/g, p < 0001). The cat owners did not have significantly higher levels of Fel d1 (1105 ng/g) in their clothes compared to the other three groups. (D: 247 ng/g, nCnD: 418 ng/g) but the levels were significantly higher than for all children without a cat at home (345 ng/g, p < 0.05). No concentrations of mite allergen and low concentrations of Fel d1 and Can f1 were found in the children's hair. There were significantly higher concentrations of Fel d1 and Can f1 in dust from curtains than in samples from floors and bookshelves (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the allergen concentrations in samples from curtains and from desks and chairs, including the teachers' chairs, the only upholstered furniture in the rooms. Our results support the hypothesis that cat and dog owners bring allergens to public areas in their clothes and support other studies showing that textiles and upholstered furniture function as reservoirs of cat and dog allergens. Thus, children with asthma and other allergic diseases will be exposed to cat and dog allergens at school and by contact with pet owners, even if they avoid animal allergens at home.
为了调查我们的假设——猫和狗的主人会通过衣服将过敏原带到公共场所——是否正确,我们研究了瑞典一所学校儿童衣服和教室灰尘中猫源Fel d1、犬源Can f1、屋尘螨Der p1和粉尘螨Der f1的含量水平。我们还调查了儿童使用的四间教室不同区域的过敏原含量水平。从四个班级中挑选了31名儿童,分为三组:养猫的儿童、养狗的儿童以及家中没有猫或狗的儿童。此外,还纳入了一组患有哮喘的儿童。在从衣服和教室采集的所有57个样本中均检测到了猫和狗的过敏原。在所检测的48个样本中有6个检测到低浓度的螨过敏原Der f1,46个样本中有5个检测到Der p1。衣服样本(几何平均值:细粉尘中Can f1为2676 ng/g,Fel d1为444 ng/g)和教室样本(Can f1:1092 ng/g,Fel d1:240 ng/g)中Can f1的浓度高于Fel d1。养狗的儿童衣服中Can f1的浓度(细粉尘中8434 ng/g)显著高于养猫的儿童(1629 ng/g,p < 0.01)、家中没有猫或狗的儿童(2742 ng/g,p < 0.05)以及患有哮喘的儿童(1518 ng/g,p < 0.001)。养猫的儿童衣服中Fel d1的浓度(1105 ng/g)与其他三组相比没有显著升高(无猫或狗组:247 ng/g,家中无猫或狗组:418 ng/g),但显著高于家中没有猫的所有儿童(345 ng/g,p < 0.05)。在儿童头发中未检测到螨过敏原浓度,Fel d1和Can f1浓度较低。窗帘灰尘中Fel d1和Can f1的浓度显著高于地板和书架样本中的浓度(p < 0.05)。窗帘样本与桌椅样本(包括教师座椅,房间里唯一的软垫家具)中的过敏原浓度没有显著差异。我们的结果支持了猫和狗的主人会通过衣服将过敏原带到公共场所这一假设,并支持了其他研究表明纺织品和软垫家具是猫和狗过敏原的储存库。因此,患有哮喘和其他过敏性疾病的儿童即使在家中避免接触动物过敏原,在学校也会通过与宠物主人接触而接触到猫和狗的过敏原。