Barton J J
Department of Neurology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
J Neurol Sci. 1998 Feb 18;155(1):104-14. doi: 10.1016/s0022-510x(97)00265-7.
Many reports in the literature describe a variety of ocular signs in myasthenia gravis. To determine the utility of laboratory recordings of ocular signs in the evaluation for myasthenia, we reviewed all previous studies of quantitative measures of eye movements or intra-ocular pressures. We selected those studies with data presented for both myasthenic and non-myasthenic ocular palsies. Signal detection theory was used to evaluate the discriminative power of each variable. The characteristics of saccades and quick phases of optokinetic nystagmus at the start of recording were poor at distinguishing between myasthenic and non-myasthenic palsies, except when the comparison was solely between myasthenia and chronic progressive external ophthalmoplegia. The effects of fatigue on saccadic parameters were also not discriminative, though there was insufficient data to evaluate this adequately. Changes induced by edrophonium in the amplitude or peak velocity of saccades or optokinetic quick phases were good diagnostic tests, retaining high sensitivities when criteria were set to yield a specificity of 95%. Most of these parameters were less efficient as screening tests, with modest specificities when criteria were set to yield a sensitivity of 95%. The change in optokinetic quick phase amplitude recorded by infrared oculography was the best test, with ideal characteristics of 97% specificity and sensitivity at a criterion of zero change. This analysis suggests that eye movement recordings of saccades or optokinetic nystagmus have potential as useful and inexpensive tests for myasthenia, and warrant further study.
文献中的许多报告描述了重症肌无力的各种眼部体征。为了确定眼部体征的实验室记录在重症肌无力评估中的效用,我们回顾了之前所有关于眼动或眼压定量测量的研究。我们选择了那些同时提供了重症肌无力性和非重症肌无力性眼肌麻痹数据的研究。信号检测理论被用于评估每个变量的判别能力。记录开始时扫视和视动性眼球震颤快相的特征在区分重症肌无力性和非重症肌无力性麻痹方面效果不佳,除非仅在重症肌无力和慢性进行性外眼肌麻痹之间进行比较。疲劳对扫视参数的影响也没有判别性,尽管数据不足以充分评估这一点。依酚氯铵引起的扫视或视动性快相幅度或峰值速度的变化是很好的诊断测试,当设定标准以产生95%的特异性时,仍保持高敏感性。作为筛查测试,这些参数大多效率较低,当设定标准以产生95%的敏感性时,特异性一般。红外眼动图记录的视动性快相幅度变化是最好的测试,在零变化标准下具有97%的特异性和敏感性的理想特征。该分析表明,扫视或视动性眼球震颤的眼动记录有潜力作为重症肌无力有用且廉价的测试方法,值得进一步研究。