Laakso M P, Soininen H, Partanen K, Lehtovirta M, Hallikainen M, Hänninen T, Helkala E L, Vainio P, Riekkinen P J
Department of Neurology, Kuopio University Hospital, Finland.
Neurobiol Aging. 1998 Jan-Feb;19(1):23-31. doi: 10.1016/s0197-4580(98)00006-2.
In this study, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the hippocampus for the diagnosis of early Alzheimer's disease (AD) is evaluated. We measured hippocampal volumes and the area of the medial hippocampus with a 1.5 T MR imager in 160 subjects: 55 patients with probable AD according to the NINCDS-ADRDA criteria, 43 subjects fulfilling the NIMH criteria of age-associated memory impairment (AAMI), 42 cognitively normal elderly controls, and 20 controls younger than 50 years. Three methods for normalization were compared. The hippocampi were atrophied in the AD patients, but not in the AAMI subjects or the elderly controls. There was no significant correlation between hippocampal volumes and age in the nondemented subjects. The discrimination based on volumetry resulted in an overall correct classification of 92% of AD patients vs. nondemented elderly subjects, whereas discrimination based on hippocampal area was less accurate, producing a correct classification in 80% of the subjects. We conclude that the hippocampus as assessed by MRI volumetry is atrophied early in AD, and spared by aging or AAMI. A brief critical review of previous studies is in concordance with the presented data: all the previous studies that have used volumetry, have similarly ended up with a good classification, whereas simpler or subjective measurements, subject to various sources of bias, have produced most variable results.
在本研究中,对利用海马磁共振成像(MRI)诊断早期阿尔茨海默病(AD)进行了评估。我们使用1.5T MR成像仪测量了160名受试者的海马体积和内侧海马面积,其中包括:根据NINCDS - ADRDA标准确诊的55例可能患有AD的患者、43例符合美国国立精神卫生研究所(NIMH)年龄相关性记忆损害(AAMI)标准的受试者、42名认知正常的老年对照以及20名年龄小于50岁的对照。比较了三种标准化方法。AD患者的海马萎缩,但AAMI受试者或老年对照未出现海马萎缩。在非痴呆受试者中,海马体积与年龄之间无显著相关性。基于体积测量的判别方法对AD患者与非痴呆老年受试者的总体正确分类率为92%,而基于海马面积的判别方法准确性较低,受试者的正确分类率为80%。我们得出结论,通过MRI体积测量评估的海马在AD早期就已萎缩,而衰老或AAMI未导致其萎缩。对先前研究的简要批判性综述与所呈现的数据一致:所有先前使用体积测量的研究同样都得到了良好的分类结果,而更简单或主观的测量方法因存在各种偏差来源,结果差异很大。