Suppr超能文献

[2nd revision consensus on blood transfusion. Central Guidance Organization for Peer Review].

作者信息

van Aken W G, Dinkelaar R B, Gorgels J P, Knape J T, van Everdingen J J

机构信息

Centraal Laboratorium voor de Bloedtransfusiedienst van het Nederlandse Rode Kruis, Amsterdam.

出版信息

Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1998 Feb 7;142(6):298-300.

PMID:9562730
Abstract

Since 1982 several consensus conferences regarding the transfusion practice in hospitals have been organized in the Netherlands. Repeated updating of the consensus text such as described in this article is required to keep abreast of new developments and changes in clinical practice. Guidelines concerning compatibility testing (the result of compatibility testing is valid for three days at most), the organization of responsibilities and the clinical use of red cell concentrates, including a protocol for transfusion in patients with massive bleeding, were changed. No consensus was reached concerning the need to use only red cells that are antigen c, E and K compatible in women younger than 45 years of age and in patients with abnormal erythropoiesis. Although the need of systematic reviews to support guidelines was recognized, literature reviews revealed that only few studies were designed well enough to allow definitive conclusions regarding the benefits and risks of red cell transfusion.

摘要

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验