Zehetgruber M, Mörtl D, Porenta G, Mundigler G, Christ G, Lengauer R, Stix G, Probst P, Maurer G, Sochor H, Siostrzonek P
Department od Cardiology, University od Vienna, Wahringer Gurtel 18-20, Vienna, Austria.
Clin Cardiol. 1998 Apr;21(4):247-52. doi: 10.1002/clc.4960210404.
Recent studies demonstrate the feasibility of coronary flow reserve measurements by transesophageal echocardiographic (TEE) Doppler recordings of coronary sinus or left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery flow velocity for detecting stenoses of the LAD artery. This study compares coronary flow reserve measurements by Doppler TEE with thallium-201 (201Tl) single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) in patients with proximal single-vessel LAD stenosis.
Nineteen patients with various degrees of LAD stenosis (mean area stenosis 71 +/- 24%; range 24-96%) were studied. Area stenosis by quantitative coronary angiography was < 75% in 7 patients and > 75% in 12 patients. Transesophageal LAD and coronary sinus Doppler measurements were performed at baseline and after intravenous dipyridamole. Coronary flow reserve was calculated as the ratio of hyperemic to baseline average peak velocities. Predefined coronary flow reserve cut-off values of 1.8 for the coronary sinus method and of 2.0 for the LAD method were used for diagnosis of significant LAD stenosis. Results were compared with qualitative 201Tl dipyridamole SPECT.
Overall predictive accuracy for diagnosis of > 75% LAD stenosis was 79% for 201Tl SPECT, 77% for the transesophageal LAD and 79% for the transesophageal coronary sinus technique. Concordant results between 201Tl SPECT and the LAD and coronary sinus Doppler methods were observed in 79% and 71% of patients, respectively.
Thallium-201 SPECT and transesophageal Doppler assessment of coronary flow reserve have similar accuracy for diagnosing significant proximal LAD stenosis. Therefore, both transesophageal Doppler techniques might constitute another widely available, noninvasive method for assessment of left coronary artery disease, if disease location is proximal.
近期研究表明,经食管超声心动图(TEE)通过记录冠状窦或左前降支(LAD)冠状动脉血流速度来测量冠状动脉血流储备,对于检测LAD动脉狭窄具有可行性。本研究比较了多普勒TEE测量冠状动脉血流储备与201铊(201Tl)单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)在近端单支LAD狭窄患者中的应用。
对19例不同程度LAD狭窄(平均面积狭窄71±24%;范围24 - 96%)的患者进行研究。通过定量冠状动脉造影,7例患者的面积狭窄<75%,12例患者的面积狭窄>75%。在基线状态及静脉注射双嘧达莫后进行经食管LAD和冠状窦多普勒测量。冠状动脉血流储备通过充血期与基线平均峰值速度之比计算得出。采用冠状窦法预定义的冠状动脉血流储备临界值为1.8,LAD法为2.0,用于诊断显著的LAD狭窄。将结果与定性的201Tl双嘧达莫SPECT进行比较。
对于诊断LAD狭窄>75%,201Tl SPECT的总体预测准确率为79%,经食管LAD为77%,经食管冠状窦技术为79%。分别在79%和71%的患者中观察到201Tl SPECT与LAD及冠状窦多普勒方法的结果一致。
201Tl SPECT和经食管多普勒评估冠状动脉血流储备在诊断近端显著LAD狭窄方面具有相似的准确性。因此,如果病变部位在近端,两种经食管多普勒技术可能构成另一种广泛可用的、非侵入性的评估左冠状动脉疾病的方法。