Mühlbauer M, Ferguson J, Losert U, Koos W T
Department of Neurosurgery, Donauspital, University of Vienna Medical School, Austria.
Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 1998 Mar;41(1):1-4. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1052005.
To explore the safety and the effectiveness of laparoscopic and thoracoscopic spinal surgery, an acute/non-survival animal trial was performed in 5 pigs using rigid and flexible endoscopes, flouroscopy, a holmium-YAG laser, and prototype instruments and implants. Our study aimed to approach the intervertebral disc space and spinal canal using laparoscopic and thoracoscopic techniques and to explore the potential and limits for endoscopic anterior spinal decompression and fusion. In a lateral recumbency access was provided to the anterolateral aspect of the lumbar spine from L1/2 to L7/S1, the thoracic spine was accessible from T2/3 to the diaphragmatic insertion. Complete disc space emptying with penetration into the spinal canal could be performed, epidural bleeding could be controlled by a hemostatic sponge, however bleeding restricted visualization for further endoscopic manipulation in the spinal canal. Intervertebral fusion was accomplished at T6/7, L4/5 and L7/S1 using small fragment plates with 3.5 mm screws and iliac bone grafts or prototype carbon fiber cages. On post mortem examination we found no dural tears and no nerve root damage, all animals had stabilized fusion sites and good implant position. We conclude that minimally invasive thoracoscopic and laparoscopic approaches to the spine are feasible and safe to perform disc decompression and implant placement for spinal fusion. In addition to currently performed laparoscopic interbody fusion, also plate fixation to reestablish lordosis of the lumbar spine is feasible at least in the porcine model. Careful disc decompression must be performed prior to implant introduction to prevent iatrogenic disc protrusion and spinal cord or nerve root compression. However, further surgical exploration of the spinal canal using these techniques does not provide adequate visualization of epidural spaces and therefore must be regarded as unsafe.
为探究腹腔镜和胸腔镜脊柱手术的安全性和有效性,使用刚性和柔性内窥镜、荧光镜、钬激光以及原型器械和植入物,对5头猪进行了急性/非存活动物试验。我们的研究旨在采用腹腔镜和胸腔镜技术进入椎间盘间隙和椎管,探索内窥镜前路脊柱减压和融合的潜力及局限性。在侧卧位时,可从L1/2至L7/S1进入腰椎的前外侧,从T2/3至膈肌附着处可进入胸椎。可实现椎间盘间隙完全清空并穿透至椎管,硬膜外出血可用止血海绵控制,但出血限制了椎管内进一步内窥镜操作的视野。在T6/7、L4/5和L7/S1处使用带有3.5毫米螺钉的小碎片钢板和髂骨移植或原型碳纤维椎间融合器完成椎间融合。尸检时我们未发现硬脑膜撕裂和神经根损伤,所有动物的融合部位均已稳定且植入物位置良好。我们得出结论,微创胸腔镜和腹腔镜脊柱手术用于椎间盘减压和植入物置入以进行脊柱融合是可行且安全的。除了目前进行的腹腔镜椎间融合术外,至少在猪模型中,使用钢板固定以重建腰椎前凸也是可行的。在植入物置入前必须小心进行椎间盘减压,以防止医源性椎间盘突出和脊髓或神经根受压。然而,使用这些技术对椎管进行进一步手术探查并不能充分显示硬膜外间隙,因此必须视为不安全的。