Inoue T, Takeda T, Lee C Y, Abiko Y, Ayukawa Y, Tanaka T, Yoshinari M, Shimono M
Oral Health Science Center, Tokyo Dental College, Chiba, Japan.
Bull Tokyo Dent Coll. 1997 Aug;38(3):187-93.
The aim of the present study was to investigate the proliferating activity of peri-implant epithelium immunohistochemically using proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA). Eight ITI (Internationale Team für Implantologie) implants were placed into simulated sockets in the mandibles of two beagle dogs two months following tooth extraction. As a control, junctional epithelium of the molar teeth in the same animals were used. The nature of staining and the distribution of PCNA immunoreactivity were determined by scoring a minimum of 100 cells on two sections from each of the implants. In the junctional epithelium, the immunoreactivity to PCNA was detected mainly in the basal cells, in some of the prickle cells, and in a few cells attached to the enamel. In peri-implant epithelium, only some of the basal cells were positive for PCNA. The PCNA score of the peri-implant epithelium was significantly lower than that of junctional epithelium. These results suggest that the peri-implant epithelium maintains a lower capacity to act as a proliferative defence mechanism than does the junctional epithelium.
本研究的目的是使用增殖细胞核抗原(PCNA)通过免疫组织化学方法研究种植体周围上皮的增殖活性。在两只比格犬拔牙两个月后,将8颗ITI(国际口腔种植学会)种植体植入下颌骨的模拟牙槽窝中。作为对照,使用同一动物磨牙的结合上皮。通过对每个种植体的两张切片上至少100个细胞进行评分,确定染色性质和PCNA免疫反应性的分布。在结合上皮中,对PCNA的免疫反应性主要在基底细胞、一些棘细胞以及少数附着于釉质的细胞中检测到。在种植体周围上皮中,只有一些基底细胞PCNA呈阳性。种植体周围上皮的PCNA评分显著低于结合上皮。这些结果表明,与结合上皮相比,种植体周围上皮作为增殖防御机制的能力较低。