White L J, Plack C J
Laboratory of Experimental Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom.
J Acoust Soc Am. 1998 Apr;103(4):2051-63. doi: 10.1121/1.421352.
The effect of tone duration on fundamental frequency (F0) discrimination is greater for complexes containing unresolved harmonics than for those containing resolved harmonics [Plack and Carlyon, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 98, 1355-1364 (1995)]. Three experiments explored this effect further. The first experiment measured sensitivity (as d') to fundamental frequency (F0) differences for two complexes, both with an F0 of 250 Hz. The first complex was low-pass filtered at 1875 Hz to create a resolved complex and the second was bandpass filtered between 5500 and 7500 Hz to create an unresolved complex. The harmonics for the resolved complex were selected so that no two harmonics were the same between the two observation intervals. Performance for both complexes was measured for tone durations of 20, 40, 80, and 160 ms. For the unresolved complex, the effect of duration was greater than that for the resolved complex and greater than the predictions of a "multiple-looks" model assuming either peripheral (before sampling) or central (after combining samples) sources of variance. The second experiment replicated these results using an F0 of 62.5 Hz with the cutoff frequencies of the bandpass filters divided by four, confirming that the effect is related to resolvability and not to spectral region. In the final experiment, F0 discrimination for pairs of complexes separated by a temporal gap was measured relative to that for one complex. Performance for the resolved and unresolved complexes was similar: Very little effect of gap duration was observed and the results were consistent with the predictions of the peripheral-variance multiple-looks model. Taken together, the results suggest that the pitch mechanism for resolved harmonics uses a relatively short sampling window of around 20 ms, while the mechanism for unresolved harmonics may use a more complex strategy for optimizing the combination of information over time, perhaps involving a flexible integration time.
与包含已分辨谐波的复合体相比,包含未分辨谐波的复合体的音调持续时间对基频(F0)辨别力的影响更大[普拉克和卡里昂,《美国声学学会杂志》98, 1355 - 1364 (1995)]。三项实验进一步探究了这种影响。第一个实验测量了两个复合体对基频(F0)差异的敏感度(以d'表示),二者的F0均为250 Hz。第一个复合体在1875 Hz进行低通滤波以创建一个已分辨的复合体,第二个复合体在5500至7500 Hz之间进行带通滤波以创建一个未分辨的复合体。已分辨复合体的谐波被选择为使得两个观察间隔之间没有两个谐波是相同的。对两种复合体在20、40、80和160毫秒的音调持续时间下的表现进行了测量。对于未分辨的复合体,持续时间的影响大于已分辨复合体的影响,并且大于假设外周(采样前)或中枢(样本合并后)方差来源的“多次观察”模型的预测。第二个实验使用62.5 Hz的F0重复了这些结果,带通滤波器的截止频率除以四,证实该影响与可分辨性有关而非与频谱区域有关。在最后一个实验中,测量了被时间间隔分开的复合体对相对于单个复合体的F0辨别力。已分辨和未分辨复合体的表现相似:观察到间隙持续时间的影响非常小,并且结果与外周方差多次观察模型的预测一致。综合来看,结果表明已分辨谐波的音高机制使用约20毫秒的相对较短采样窗口,而未分辨谐波的机制可能使用更复杂的策略来优化随时间的信息组合,也许涉及灵活的整合时间。