Suppr超能文献

Chiropractic utilization of lumbar magnetic resonance imaging: how accurate are we compared with other specialties?

作者信息

Kilmer S E

出版信息

J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1998 Mar-Apr;21(3):173-6.

PMID:9567237
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine, through the review of lumbar magnetic resonance images (MRIs), which specialty ordering these scans was more successful and accurate in coming up with "positive findings" that would warrant the use of the modality. Such data can demonstrate to managed care organizations and insurance companies that chiropractors have a good working knowledge of when to use this test and that the profession deserves the right to direct access to MRI.

DESIGN

Seven hundred and two lumbar MRIs taken over a 3-yr period were reviewed. A list of seven criteria was made consisting of (a) disc derangement, (b) stenosis, (c) trauma, (d) tumors, (e) hematologic and vascular, (f) infection and (g) metabolic-endocrine disorders. Scans found to have one of the seven categories were listed as positive findings. The number of positives were then entered under each separate specialty group and a percentage was calculated for each.

RESULTS

This study showed that DCs fared better than all providers except for oncologists and general surgeons. Chiropractors fared 2.42% better than orthopedists and 10.06% better than general practitioners, who, ironically, DCs must rely on at times for authorization of MRIs in certain managed care situations.

CONCLUSION

It would be fruitful to conduct similar studies of this type, thus obtaining a larger database of information that reflects more accurate numbers nationwide and documents chiropractors' working knowledge of when to use this imaging modality.

摘要

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验