Suppr超能文献

一项关于磺胺甲恶唑/甲氧苄啶联合诺氟沙星与单用磺胺甲恶唑/甲氧苄啶预防肺癌化疗期间细菌感染的随机对照试验。

A randomized controlled trial of sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim plus norfloxacin versus sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim alone for the prophylaxis of bacteria infection during chemotherapy for lung cancer.

作者信息

Nagatomo A, Watanabe K, Kunikane H, Okamoto H, Kunitoh H

机构信息

Department of Respiratory Medicine, Yokohama Municipal Citizen's Hospital, Japan.

出版信息

Lung Cancer. 1998 Feb;19(2):121-5. doi: 10.1016/s0169-5002(97)00087-1.

Abstract

The efficacy of the prophylactic administration of sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim (ST) plus norfloxacin (NFLX) versus ST alone to prevent the development of bacterial infection during chemotherapy-induced leukopenia was compared in patients with lung cancer. Patients who underwent systemic chemotherapy were randomized into one of the prophylactic regimens when grade 3 or 4 leukopenia occurred. Prophylactic treatment was performed on 133 courses of leukopenia in 75 patients and the efficacy was evaluated on 127 of those courses after excluding those patients who demonstrated a fever within 24 h from the start of the prophylaxis. The number of patients who had leukopenia associated fever was two out of 63 (3.2%) with the ST plus NFLX regimen and 10 out of 64 (15.6%) with ST alone; the difference was statistically significant. The prophylactic use of ST plus NFLX was thus found to be more useful than ST alone for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced leukopenia in patients with lung cancer.

摘要

在肺癌患者中,比较了预防性给予磺胺甲恶唑/甲氧苄啶(ST)加诺氟沙星(NFLX)与单独使用ST预防化疗诱导的白细胞减少期间细菌感染发生的疗效。接受全身化疗的患者在出现3级或4级白细胞减少时被随机分配到一种预防性治疗方案中。对75例患者的133个白细胞减少疗程进行了预防性治疗,并在排除那些从预防开始后24小时内出现发热的患者后,对其中127个疗程的疗效进行了评估。ST加NFLX方案的63例患者中有2例(3.2%)出现白细胞减少相关发热,单独使用ST的64例患者中有10例(15.6%)出现;差异具有统计学意义。因此,发现预防性使用ST加NFLX比单独使用ST对治疗肺癌患者化疗诱导的白细胞减少更有效。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验