Zermani R G, Zarabini A, Trivisonno A
Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Parma, Italy.
Burns. 1997 Nov-Dec;23(7-8):604-7. doi: 10.1016/s0305-4179(97)00032-6.
The micrografting technique, employed to treat patients with extensive TBSA burns and reduced areas of healthy donor skin, was assessed simultaneously with traditional mesh grafts (STSG) or Tiersch grafts in the treatment five severely burned subjects (average TBSA burned 35.6 per cent; average per cent of full thickness wounds 32.6 per cent). At the first clinical control on day 6 post-surgery, 93 per cent of the micrografted area was in situ and health; epithelialization of the wound sites was complete at day 21. Meshed STSG yielded 90 per cent attachment at day 6 post-surgery, with epithelialization complete at 12 +/- 2 days post-surgery. Functional results were equivalent no matter what technique was used, while aesthetic results were better in the areas where micrografting was carried out. Although the micrograft technique is labour-intensive, if the expansion needed is at least 1:6, the aesthetic and functional results obtained are comparable to, or better than, those with meshed grafts. Also, large segments of micrograft are not compromised if a small area of mesh becomes detached, and epithelialization is faster and more uniform, enabling a reduction in both infection and length of hospital stay.
微移植技术用于治疗大面积烧伤体表总面积(TBSA)且健康供皮区面积减少的患者,在治疗5例严重烧伤患者(平均烧伤TBSA为35.6%;平均全层伤口比例为32.6%)时,与传统网状植皮(STSG)或蒂尔施植皮同时进行评估。术后第6天首次临床检查时,93%的微移植区域原位且健康;伤口部位在术后第21天上皮化完成。网状STSG在术后第6天的附着率为90%,上皮化在术后12±2天完成。无论使用何种技术,功能结果相当,而微移植区域的美学效果更好。尽管微移植技术劳动强度大,但如果所需的扩张比例至少为1:6,所获得的美学和功能结果与网状植皮相当或更好。此外,如果一小片网状植皮脱落,大片微移植区域不受影响,且上皮化更快、更均匀,能够减少感染并缩短住院时间。