• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

逆行可弯曲输尿管软镜钬激光碎石术:新的金标准。

Retrograde flexible ureterorenoscopic holmium-YAG laser lithotripsy: the new gold standard.

作者信息

Gould D L

机构信息

Department of Surgery, John Peter Smith Hospital, Fort Worth, Texas, USA.

出版信息

Tech Urol. 1998 Mar;4(1):22-4.

PMID:9568772
Abstract

To demonstrate the efficacy of flexible retrograde ureterorenoscopic holmium-YAG intracorporeal laser lithotripsy for the treatment of renal calculi, a total of 86 patients presenting to our hospital with renal calculi underwent flexible retrograde ureterorenoscopic holmium-YAG intracorporeal laser lithotripsy of their stones, and the data were collected prospectively. As extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy is not available at our institution, all patients with renal calculi in this study were treated in a retrograde fashion using the Richard Wolf 6.0F semirigid ureteroscope, the 7.5F flexible ureterorenoscope, and the holmium-YAG laser by Coherent Inc. Except for inhospital consults or patients requiring admission secondary to infection, all cases were performed on an ambulatory basis. All renal calculi 3 cm or smaller were approached in a retrograde fashion. Where possible, the stones were initially debulked using the semirigid ureteroscope and the 550-microm fiber followed by the flexible ureterorenoscope in combination with the 360- or 200-microm laser fiber depending on stone position. Stones were fragmented until they were small enough to be removed by hydrocleansing. Using this technique, stone-free success rates for calculi 2.5 cm or smaller after a single treatment, regardless of stone composition or location, are superior to those of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. For calculi between 2.5 and 3 cm, the results also are noted to be superior. We conclude that for calculi larger than 3 cm or for partial staghorn calculi, the treatment of choice appears to be a percutaneous approach.

摘要

为证明软性逆行输尿管肾镜钬-钇铝石榴石体内激光碎石术治疗肾结石的疗效,我院共86例肾结石患者接受了软性逆行输尿管肾镜钬-钇铝石榴石体内激光碎石术,并前瞻性收集了相关数据。由于我院无法开展体外冲击波碎石术,本研究中所有肾结石患者均采用逆行方式治疗,使用理查德·沃尔夫6.0F半硬性输尿管镜、7.5F软性输尿管肾镜以及相干公司生产的钬-钇铝石榴石激光。除住院会诊患者或因感染需住院治疗的患者外,所有病例均在门诊进行。所有直径3cm及以下的肾结石均采用逆行方式处理。可能的话,先用半硬性输尿管镜和550微米光纤初步减容结石,然后根据结石位置,联合使用软性输尿管肾镜及360微米或200微米激光光纤。将结石粉碎至足够小以便通过水冲洗清除。使用该技术,无论结石成分或位置如何,单次治疗后直径2.5cm及以下结石的无石成功率均优于体外冲击波碎石术。对于直径在2.5至3cm之间的结石,结果也显示更为优越。我们得出结论,对于直径大于3cm的结石或部分鹿角形结石,首选治疗方法似乎是经皮途径。

相似文献

1
Retrograde flexible ureterorenoscopic holmium-YAG laser lithotripsy: the new gold standard.逆行可弯曲输尿管软镜钬激光碎石术:新的金标准。
Tech Urol. 1998 Mar;4(1):22-4.
2
Retrograde ureteropyeloscopic treatment of 2 cm. or greater upper urinary tract and minor Staghorn calculi.逆行输尿管肾盂镜治疗2厘米及以上上尿路结石和小型鹿角形结石。
J Urol. 1998 Aug;160(2):346-51.
3
Comparison between extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and semirigid ureterorenoscope with holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy for treating large proximal ureteral stones.体外冲击波碎石术与钬激光联合半硬性输尿管肾镜治疗近端输尿管大结石的比较。
J Urol. 2004 Nov;172(5 Pt 1):1899-902. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000142848.43880.b3.
4
Holmium:YAG Lasertripsy with semirigid ureterorenoscope for upper-ureteral stones >2 cm.钬:钇铝石榴石激光碎石术联合半硬性输尿管肾镜治疗直径大于2厘米的上段输尿管结石。
J Endourol. 2005 Sep;19(7):780-4. doi: 10.1089/end.2005.19.780.
5
Combined electrohydraulic and holmium:YAG laser ureteroscopic nephrolithotripsy of large (greater than 4 cm) renal calculi.联合电液压与钬激光:YAG激光输尿管镜下治疗大(大于4厘米)肾结石
J Urol. 2007 Jan;177(1):168-73; discussion173. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.08.066.
6
Therapeutic options for proximal ureter stone: extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus semirigid ureterorenoscope with holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser lithotripsy.近端输尿管结石的治疗选择:体外冲击波碎石术与带有钬:钇铝石榴石激光碎石术的半硬性输尿管肾镜检查术对比
Urology. 2005 Jun;65(6):1075-9. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.12.026.
7
Retrograde intrarenal stone surgery for extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy-resistant kidney stones.逆行性肾内手术治疗体外冲击波碎石术治疗失败的肾结石
Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2006;40(5):380-4. doi: 10.1080/00365590600679269.
8
A comparison of holmium:YAG laser with Lithoclast lithotripsy in ureteral calculi fragmentation.钬激光与气压弹道碎石术治疗输尿管结石的疗效比较。
Int J Urol. 2005 Jun;12(6):544-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2005.01087.x.
9
Management of lower pole renal calculi: shock wave lithotripsy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus flexible ureteroscopy.下极肾结石的治疗:冲击波碎石术与经皮肾镜取石术与软性输尿管镜检查术的对比
Urol Res. 2006 Apr;34(2):108-11. doi: 10.1007/s00240-005-0020-6. Epub 2006 Feb 7.
10
Flexible ureterorenoscopy and holmium laser lithotripsy for the management of renal stone burdens that measure 2 to 3 cm: a multi-institutional experience.经皮肾镜取石术与钬激光碎石术治疗 2-3cm 肾结石:多中心经验。
J Endourol. 2010 Oct;24(10):1583-8. doi: 10.1089/end.2009.0629.

引用本文的文献

1
A historical comparison of thulium fiber laser systems for stone lithotripsy: navigating toward safe and effective parameters.钬光纤激光系统在结石碎石术中的历史比较:探索安全有效的参数。
World J Urol. 2024 Mar 13;42(1):145. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-04789-6.