Laine K, Määttä T, Varonen H, Mäkelä M
Nurmijärvi Health Centre, Finland.
Rhinology. 1998 Mar;36(1):2-6.
In primary care, acute maxillary sinusitis may be diagnosed by clinical examination, ultrasound or radiography. Previous studies on the diagnostic accuracy of these methods are from secondary care settings and may not be generalisable to primary care. In this study of 39 primary care patients we have compared ultrasound, clinical examination and radiography to sinus irrigation. The sensitivity of ultrasound performed by general practitioners is 61% and specificity is 53%. Diagnostic accuracy does not improve when the general practitioner bases the diagnosis on combination of clinical examination and ultrasound. The most accurate way to diagnose sinusitis is radiography and when the radiographs are interpreted by a radiologist (sensitivity: 61%; specificity: 98%). The accuracy of the ultrasound examination performed by general practitioners is poorer than earlier results from ENT practices. More attention should be paid to education and quality management in the use of ultrasound in primary care.
在基层医疗中,急性上颌窦炎可通过临床检查、超声或影像学检查来诊断。以往关于这些方法诊断准确性的研究来自二级医疗机构,可能不适用于基层医疗。在这项针对39名基层医疗患者的研究中,我们将超声、临床检查和影像学检查与鼻窦冲洗进行了比较。全科医生进行超声检查的敏感性为61%,特异性为53%。当全科医生根据临床检查和超声检查相结合进行诊断时,诊断准确性并未提高。诊断鼻窦炎最准确的方法是影像学检查,由放射科医生解读X光片时(敏感性:61%;特异性:98%)。全科医生进行的超声检查准确性低于耳鼻喉科诊所早期的结果。在基层医疗中使用超声时,应更加重视教育和质量管理。