Suppr超能文献

基层医疗中急性上颌窦炎的诊断:超声、临床检查与影像学检查的比较

Diagnosing acute maxillary sinusitis in primary care: a comparison of ultrasound, clinical examination and radiography.

作者信息

Laine K, Määttä T, Varonen H, Mäkelä M

机构信息

Nurmijärvi Health Centre, Finland.

出版信息

Rhinology. 1998 Mar;36(1):2-6.

PMID:9569433
Abstract

In primary care, acute maxillary sinusitis may be diagnosed by clinical examination, ultrasound or radiography. Previous studies on the diagnostic accuracy of these methods are from secondary care settings and may not be generalisable to primary care. In this study of 39 primary care patients we have compared ultrasound, clinical examination and radiography to sinus irrigation. The sensitivity of ultrasound performed by general practitioners is 61% and specificity is 53%. Diagnostic accuracy does not improve when the general practitioner bases the diagnosis on combination of clinical examination and ultrasound. The most accurate way to diagnose sinusitis is radiography and when the radiographs are interpreted by a radiologist (sensitivity: 61%; specificity: 98%). The accuracy of the ultrasound examination performed by general practitioners is poorer than earlier results from ENT practices. More attention should be paid to education and quality management in the use of ultrasound in primary care.

摘要

在基层医疗中,急性上颌窦炎可通过临床检查、超声或影像学检查来诊断。以往关于这些方法诊断准确性的研究来自二级医疗机构,可能不适用于基层医疗。在这项针对39名基层医疗患者的研究中,我们将超声、临床检查和影像学检查与鼻窦冲洗进行了比较。全科医生进行超声检查的敏感性为61%,特异性为53%。当全科医生根据临床检查和超声检查相结合进行诊断时,诊断准确性并未提高。诊断鼻窦炎最准确的方法是影像学检查,由放射科医生解读X光片时(敏感性:61%;特异性:98%)。全科医生进行的超声检查准确性低于耳鼻喉科诊所早期的结果。在基层医疗中使用超声时,应更加重视教育和质量管理。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验