Physiological and histological data were obtained from soleus and tibialis anterior muscles of normal adult cats to study to what extent fibre length and sarcomere number varied between animals and how this was related to the physiological characteristics of the muscles. 2. For a given muscle, the variation in the sarcomere number of individual muscle fibres between animals was found to be about 25%. These difference could partly be explained by comparing the number of sarcomeres and the length of the fibula, which was chosen as an index of the size of the animal. The average sarcomere number in the tibialis anterior muscle was about 60% greater than in the soleus. The variations between animals and between the anterior tibialis and soleus muscles were significantly greater than the variations observed within the same muscle. 3. The sarcomere length is dependent upon the articular angle, that is to say, the length change imposed on the muscle. These length changes are more extensive in the soleus muscle (100%) than in the tibialis anterior muscle (60%). A very significant correlation was found between articular angle and sarcomere length (for soleus r = 0.98, for tibialis anterior r = 0.94). 4. Although fibre length did vary considerably within a given muscle, the sarcomere length showed only minor variations at any given angle. This suggests that sarcomere number is determined in each individual muscle fibre. Such an adaptation implies a concomitant adaptation of the tendinous part of the fibre. This adaptation, resulting in definite sarcomere length at a definite angle, has obvious physiological implications. 5. Conventional length vs. active tension curves were established for the soleus and the tibialis anterior muscles. It is suggested that the difference between the sarcomere number of the two muscles may result in the difference between the shape of curves of these two muscles. 6. Active torque-angle curves were established for the two muscles in situ. The shapes of the curves for soleus and tibialis anterior are similar in spite of the different mechanical conditions of the two muscles. This fact helps to explain why the two muscles, despite their similar articular range, had very different sarcomere number.
