Nagel E, Meyer zu Vilsendorf A, Pichlmayr R
Klinik für Abdominal- und Transplantationschirurgie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover.
Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl Kongressbd. 1997;114:627-31.
In the discussion on cost savings in public health, one can differentiate between rationalisation and rationing. In this context rationalisation means increase in productivity with reduced resources, or more efficient rationing of the available means in order to obtain sufficient room for manoeuvre in the public health system. By efficient use of the existing resources and adaptation to medically appropriate and necessary options one is able to define medical standards for treatment. These treatment standards enable the preservation of medical freedom of action as well as participation in scientific-technological progress with the help of consequent evaluation of treatment patterns. This process could result in the development of a so-called priorisation, i.e. active preference of certain indications or therapies, which correspond extensively to the expectations and priorities of all concerned persons. From the medical point of view explicit rationing of health performances has to be strictly rejected.
在关于公共卫生领域成本节约的讨论中,可以区分合理化与配给。在此背景下,合理化意味着以更少的资源提高生产力,或者更有效地分配现有资源,以便在公共卫生系统中获得足够的回旋余地。通过有效利用现有资源并适应医学上适当且必要的选择,能够确定治疗的医学标准。这些治疗标准有助于在对治疗模式进行后续评估的帮助下,维护医疗行动自由以及参与科技进步。这一过程可能会导致所谓的优先级排序的发展,即对某些适应症或疗法的积极偏好,这与所有相关人员的期望和优先事项广泛相符。从医学角度来看,必须坚决拒绝明确的卫生服务配给。