• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Capacity to choose place of residence: autonomy vs beneficence?

作者信息

Strang D G, Molloy D W, Harrison C

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.

出版信息

J Palliat Care. 1998 Spring;14(1):25-9.

PMID:9575710
Abstract

Health care workers often perceive a conflict between autonomy and beneficence when dealing with clients living at risk in the community. Respect for personal freedom and the desire to help and protect vulnerable people frequently appear to demand opposite interventions. The assessment of decision-making capacity is a vital part of any process that deals with these complicated situations and can resolve some of the apparent conflict. Standardized assessment tools which are flexible enough to deal with the complexities of capacity assessment are needed. Health care workers aim to maximize the safety of people incapable of making decisions while protecting the freedom and autonomy of the capable. Some limits to autonomy must be accepted, especially where others' interests are threatened.

摘要

相似文献

1
Capacity to choose place of residence: autonomy vs beneficence?
J Palliat Care. 1998 Spring;14(1):25-9.
2
Conflicts of interest: research and clinical care.利益冲突:研究与临床护理
Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 1994;8(Suppl. 4):49-57.
3
Competency and consent in dementia.痴呆症中的能力与同意
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1998 Jul;46(7):922-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1998.tb02734.x.
4
Impairments and impediments in patients' decision making: reframing the competence question.患者决策中的损伤与障碍:重新审视能力问题。
J Clin Ethics. 1993 Winter;4(4):294-307; discussion 340-1.
5
Legal and ethical issues in family caregiving and the role of public policy.
Home Health Care Serv Q. 1991;12(4):5-28. doi: 10.1300/j027v12n04_02.
6
Expanding autonomy of the elderly in home health care programs.
New Engl Law Rev. 1990 Winter;25(2):421-55.
7
Ethical dimensions of autonomy in long-term care.长期护理中自主性的伦理维度。
Generations. 1990;14(Suppl. 1990):9-12.
8
The duty to care--the right to refuse. Changing roles of patients and physicians in end-of-life decision making.照护职责——拒绝的权利。临终决策中患者与医生角色的转变。
J Leg Med. 1998 Mar;19(1):99-125. doi: 10.1080/01947649809511054.
9
The conflict between autonomy and beneficence in medical ethics: proposal for a resolution.医学伦理学中自主性与行善原则之间的冲突:一种解决方案的提议。
J Contemp Health Law Policy. 1987 Spring;3:23-46.
10
Beyond guardianship reform: a reevaluation of autonomy and beneficence for a system of principled decision-making in long term care.
Emory Law J. 1992 Summer;41(3):633-760.

引用本文的文献

1
Going home? An ethnographic study of assessment of capacity and best interests in people with dementia being discharged from hospital.回家?一项关于评估痴呆症患者出院时的行为能力和最大利益的人种志研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2014 Apr 23;14:56. doi: 10.1186/1471-2318-14-56.
2
Assessing capacity in the setting of self-neglect: development of a novel screening tool for decision-making capacity.在自我忽视背景下评估能力:一种用于决策能力的新型筛查工具的开发
J Elder Abuse Negl. 2006;18(4):79-91. doi: 10.1300/j084v18n04_08.