Gilliland F D, Hunt W C, Key C R
Department of Medicine, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, USA.
Cancer. 1998 May 1;82(9):1769-83. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19980501)82:9<1784::aid-cncr26>3.0.co;2-#.
The burden of cancer mortality falls disproportionately on cancer patients belonging to ethnic minority groups. In the U.S., African American, Hispanic, and American Indian cancer patients are diagnosed at a more advanced stage and receive less appropriate treatment, resulting in poorer outcomes and higher mortality, than white cancer patients. The authors hypothesized that cancer control strategies based on earlier detection and more effective treatment may be most effective in increasing survival in groups with more advanced disease at diagnosis, less appropriate treatment, and lower survival.
Data collected by the New Mexico Tumor Registry, a member organization of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program of the National Cancer Institute, afforded the authors an opportunity to investigate this hypothesis by studying trends in cancer survival for American Indians, Hispanics, and non-Hispanic whites. The authors examined temporal trends and ethnic disparities in survival for in situ and invasive incident cancer cases at 25 sites diagnosed from 1969 through 1994 in New Mexico residents and in American Indians residing in Arizona.
The distribution of stage became more favorable and the percentage of patients receiving appropriate treatment increased for all three ethnic groups during the study period. Survival improved for patients with cancer at most sites in each ethnic group; however, because the increase in survival was greater for non-Hispanic whites than for American Indians or Hispanics, the number of sites associated with disparities in survival among non-Hispanic whites, American Indians, and Hispanics increased. Differences in the distribution of age, gender, stage at diagnosis, histologic grade, and treatment did not completely explain the improved survival or the ethnic disparities regarding survival.
Increased cancer control efforts were associated with earlier diagnosis, more patients receiving appropriate therapy, and improved survival for non-Hispanic whites, American Indians, and Hispanics. However, the improvement was greatest for non-Hispanic whites, and disparities in survival results for the different ethnic groups widened over the period of study. Cancer control strategies need to address the specific social, cultural, and biologic prognostic factors that affect different ethnic groups if disparities in outcomes are to be reduced.
癌症死亡负担在少数族裔癌症患者中分布不均。在美国,非裔美国人、西班牙裔和美国印第安癌症患者被诊断出时病情更晚,接受的治疗也不太恰当,与白人癌症患者相比,其治疗效果更差,死亡率更高。作者推测,基于早期检测和更有效治疗的癌症控制策略,对于诊断时疾病更晚期、治疗不太恰当且生存率较低的群体,在提高生存率方面可能最为有效。
由新墨西哥肿瘤登记处收集的数据,该登记处是美国国立癌症研究所监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)项目的成员组织,为作者提供了一个机会,通过研究美国印第安人、西班牙裔和非西班牙裔白人的癌症生存趋势来调查这一假设。作者研究了1969年至1994年在新墨西哥州居民以及居住在亚利桑那州的美国印第安人中诊断出的25个部位原位癌和侵袭性癌病例的生存时间趋势和种族差异。
在研究期间,所有三个种族的癌症分期分布变得更有利,接受适当治疗的患者百分比增加。每个种族中大多数部位的癌症患者生存率都有所提高;然而,由于非西班牙裔白人的生存率提高幅度大于美国印第安人或西班牙裔,非西班牙裔白人、美国印第安人和西班牙裔之间生存差异相关的部位数量增加。年龄、性别、诊断时分期、组织学分级和治疗分布的差异并不能完全解释生存率的提高或生存方面的种族差异。
加强癌症控制措施与更早诊断、更多患者接受适当治疗以及非西班牙裔白人、美国印第安人和西班牙裔的生存率提高相关。然而,非西班牙裔白人的改善最大,并且在研究期间不同种族的生存结果差异扩大。如果要减少结果差异,癌症控制策略需要解决影响不同种族的特定社会、文化和生物学预后因素。