• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国手语中的语音和语义启动:N300和N400效应。

Phonological and semantic priming in American Sign Language: N300 and N400 effects.

作者信息

Meade Gabriela, Lee Brittany, Midgley Katherine J, Holcomb Phillip J, Emmorey Karen

机构信息

Joint Doctoral Program in Language and Communicative Disorders, San Diego State University and University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.

Department of Psychology, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, USA.

出版信息

Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2018;33(9):1092-1106. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2018.1446543. Epub 2018 Mar 7.

DOI:10.1080/23273798.2018.1446543
PMID:30662923
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6335044/
Abstract

This study investigated the electrophysiological signatures of phonological and semantic priming in American Sign Language (ASL). Deaf signers made semantic relatedness judgments to pairs of ASL signs separated by a 1300 ms prime-target SOA. Phonologically related sign pairs shared two of three phonological parameters (handshape, location, and movement). Target signs preceded by phonologically related and semantically related prime signs elicited smaller negativities within the N300 and N400 windows than those preceded by unrelated primes. N300 effects, typically reported in studies of picture processing, are interpreted to reflect the mapping from the visual features of the signs to more abstract linguistic representations. N400 effects, consistent with rhyme priming effects in the spoken language literature, are taken to index lexico-semantic processes that appear to be largely modality independent. Together, these results highlight both the unique visual-manual nature of sign languages and the linguistic processing characteristics they share with spoken languages.

摘要

本研究调查了美国手语(ASL)中语音和语义启动的电生理特征。聋人手语者对以1300毫秒启动刺激 - 目标刺激间隔(SOA)隔开的ASL手势对进行语义相关性判断。语音相关的手势对在三个语音参数(手型、位置和动作)中共享两个。与无关启动刺激相比,由语音相关和语义相关的启动手势之前的目标手势在N300和N400窗口内引发的负波较小。N300效应通常在图片处理研究中报道,被解释为反映从手势的视觉特征到更抽象语言表征的映射。N400效应与口语语言文献中的押韵启动效应一致,被视为索引词汇语义过程,这些过程似乎在很大程度上与模态无关。总之,这些结果突出了手语独特的视觉 - 手动性质以及它们与口语共享的语言处理特征。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f347/6335044/fb5fc0f6e959/nihms-978944-f0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f347/6335044/0c79c50ae4cc/nihms-978944-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f347/6335044/74ab372ef867/nihms-978944-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f347/6335044/3c3be4a4d435/nihms-978944-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f347/6335044/2aa35d6ef1ed/nihms-978944-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f347/6335044/f2c666eafd66/nihms-978944-f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f347/6335044/fb5fc0f6e959/nihms-978944-f0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f347/6335044/0c79c50ae4cc/nihms-978944-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f347/6335044/74ab372ef867/nihms-978944-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f347/6335044/3c3be4a4d435/nihms-978944-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f347/6335044/2aa35d6ef1ed/nihms-978944-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f347/6335044/f2c666eafd66/nihms-978944-f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f347/6335044/fb5fc0f6e959/nihms-978944-f0006.jpg

相似文献

1
Phonological and semantic priming in American Sign Language: N300 and N400 effects.美国手语中的语音和语义启动:N300和N400效应。
Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2018;33(9):1092-1106. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2018.1446543. Epub 2018 Mar 7.
2
Are form priming effects phonological or perceptual? Electrophysiological evidence from American Sign Language.形式启动效应是语音的还是知觉的?来自美国手语的电生理学证据。
Cognition. 2022 Mar;220:104979. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104979. Epub 2021 Dec 11.
3
ERP Evidence for Co-Activation of English Words during Recognition of American Sign Language Signs.事件相关电位(ERP)证据表明,在识别美国手语手势时英语单词会共同激活。
Brain Sci. 2019 Jun 21;9(6):148. doi: 10.3390/brainsci9060148.
4
Electrophysiological correlates of cross-linguistic semantic integration in hearing signers: N400 and LPC.听力正常的手语使用者跨语言语义整合的电生理关联:N400和晚期正成分(LPC)
Neuropsychologia. 2014 Jul;59:57-73. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.04.011. Epub 2014 Apr 19.
5
Electrophysiological evidence for phonological priming in Spanish Sign Language lexical access.电生理学证据表明西班牙语手语词汇获取中存在语音启动现象。
Neuropsychologia. 2012 Jun;50(7):1335-46. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.02.018. Epub 2012 Mar 1.
6
Phonological processing of rhyme in spoken language and location in sign language by deaf and hearing participants: a neurophysiological study.口语中韵的语音处理和聋人及听力参与者手语中位置的语音处理:一项神经生理学研究。
Neurophysiol Clin. 2013 Jun;43(3):151-60. doi: 10.1016/j.neucli.2013.03.001. Epub 2013 Apr 19.
7
Implicit co-activation of American Sign Language in deaf readers: An ERP study.聋人读者中美国手语的内隐共同激活:一项事件相关电位研究。
Brain Lang. 2017 Jul;170:50-61. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2017.03.004. Epub 2017 Apr 10.
8
Effects of iconicity and semantic relatedness on lexical access in american sign language.标志性和语义相关性对美国手语词汇获取的影响。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2010 Nov;36(6):1573-81. doi: 10.1037/a0020934.
9
Masked ERP repetition priming in deaf and hearing readers.聋人和听力正常读者的蒙面 ERP 重复启动。
Brain Lang. 2021 Mar;214:104903. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2020.104903. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
10
Cross-modal translation priming and iconicity effects in deaf signers and hearing learners of American Sign Language.美国手语聋人使用者及听力正常学习者中的跨模态翻译启动效应与象似性效应
Biling (Camb Engl). 2020 Nov;23(5):1032-1044. doi: 10.1017/S1366728919000889. Epub 2020 Jan 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Neural associations between fingerspelling, print, and signs: An ERP priming study with deaf readers.手指拼写、印刷体和手语之间的神经关联:一项针对聋人读者的ERP启动研究。
Brain Lang. 2025 Sep;268:105610. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2025.105610. Epub 2025 Jul 4.
2
Tracking effects of age of sign language acquisition and phonology in American Sign Language sentence processing.追踪美国手语句子处理中手语习得年龄和音系学的影响。
Mem Cognit. 2025 Mar 27. doi: 10.3758/s13421-025-01695-z.
3
Sign recognition: the effect of parameters and features in sign mispronunciations.

本文引用的文献

1
Bilingual word recognition in deaf and hearing signers: Effects of proficiency and language dominance on cross-language activation.聋人和听力正常的手语使用者的双语词汇识别:熟练程度和语言优势对跨语言激活的影响。
Second Lang Res. 2014 Apr 1;30(2):251-271. doi: 10.1177/0267658313503467. Epub 2014 Apr 14.
2
Implicit co-activation of American Sign Language in deaf readers: An ERP study.聋人读者中美国手语的内隐共同激活:一项事件相关电位研究。
Brain Lang. 2017 Jul;170:50-61. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2017.03.004. Epub 2017 Apr 10.
3
ASL-LEX: A lexical database of American Sign Language.
手语识别:参数和特征在手语发音错误中的作用
Linguist Vanguard. 2024 Nov 25;10(1):275-284. doi: 10.1515/lingvan-2024-0070. eCollection 2024 Dec.
4
Ongoing Sign Processing Facilitates Written Word Recognition in Deaf Native Signing Children.持续的手语处理有助于聋人母语手语儿童的书面文字识别。
Front Psychol. 2022 Aug 5;13:917700. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.917700. eCollection 2022.
5
Predictive Processing in Sign Languages: A Systematic Review.手语中的预测处理:系统综述
Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 14;13:805792. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.805792. eCollection 2022.
6
Are form priming effects phonological or perceptual? Electrophysiological evidence from American Sign Language.形式启动效应是语音的还是知觉的?来自美国手语的电生理学证据。
Cognition. 2022 Mar;220:104979. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104979. Epub 2021 Dec 11.
7
Tracking the time course of sign recognition using ERP repetition priming.使用 ERP 重复启动技术追踪符号识别的时间进程。
Psychophysiology. 2022 Mar;59(3):e13975. doi: 10.1111/psyp.13975. Epub 2021 Nov 17.
8
The organization of the American Sign Language lexicon: Comparing one- and two-parameter ERP phonological priming effects across tasks.美国手语词汇的组织:跨任务比较单参数和双参数 ERP 语音启动效应。
Brain Lang. 2021 Jul;218:104960. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2021.104960. Epub 2021 Apr 30.
9
The ASL-LEX 2.0 Project: A Database of Lexical and Phonological Properties for 2,723 Signs in American Sign Language.ASL-LEX 2.0 项目:美国手语 2723 个手语词汇的词汇和音韵属性数据库。
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2021 Mar 17;26(2):263-277. doi: 10.1093/deafed/enaa038.
10
Neurophysiological Correlates of Frequency, Concreteness, and Iconicity in American Sign Language.美国手语中频率、具体性和象似性的神经生理关联
Neurobiol Lang (Camb). 2020;1(2):249-267. doi: 10.1162/nol_a_00012. Epub 2020 Jul 7.
美国手语词汇数据库(ASL-LEX)
Behav Res Methods. 2017 Apr;49(2):784-801. doi: 10.3758/s13428-016-0742-0.
4
Language co-activation and lexical selection in bimodal bilinguals: Evidence from picture-word interference.双语者的语言共同激活与词汇选择:来自图片-单词干扰任务的证据。
Biling (Camb Engl). 2016 Mar;19(2):264-276. doi: 10.1017/S1366728915000097. Epub 2015 Apr 10.
5
Monitoring Different Phonological Parameters of Sign Language Engages the Same Cortical Language Network but Distinctive Perceptual Ones.监测手语的不同语音参数会激活相同的皮质语言网络,但会激活不同的感知网络。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2016 Jan;28(1):20-40. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00872. Epub 2015 Sep 9.
6
The role of syllables in sign language production.手语产生中音节的作用。
Front Psychol. 2014 Nov 13;5:1254. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01254. eCollection 2014.
7
ERP correlates of German Sign Language processing in deaf native signers.聋人母语手语德语手语加工的 ERP 相关性。
BMC Neurosci. 2014 May 10;15:62. doi: 10.1186/1471-2202-15-62.
8
Electrophysiological correlates of cross-linguistic semantic integration in hearing signers: N400 and LPC.听力正常的手语使用者跨语言语义整合的电生理关联:N400和晚期正成分(LPC)
Neuropsychologia. 2014 Jul;59:57-73. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.04.011. Epub 2014 Apr 19.
9
The processing nature of the n400: evidence from masked priming.N400 的加工性质:来自掩蔽启动的证据。
J Cogn Neurosci. 1993 Winter;5(1):34-44. doi: 10.1162/jocn.1993.5.1.34.
10
Lexical prediction via forward models: N400 evidence from German Sign Language.基于前向模型的词汇预测:德语手语中的 N400 证据。
Neuropsychologia. 2013 Sep;51(11):2224-37. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.07.013. Epub 2013 Jul 26.