Horlock N, Wilson G D, Daley F M, Richman P I, Grobbelaar A O, Sanders R, Foy C
RAFT Institute of Plastic Surgery, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, Middlesex, UK.
Br J Plast Surg. 1998 Jan;51(1):59-66. doi: 10.1054/bjps.1997.0031.
This study compared the clinical features, histological subtype, growth fraction (by Ki67 immunohistochemistry) and proliferation pattern of 22 clinically defined horrifying basal cell carcinoma compared to 81 non horrifying lesions. Late presentation was associated with half of the horrifying tumours. The other half developed horrifying tumours despite early intervention. The horrifying tumours exhibited a variety of histological growth patterns. A total of 50% were infiltrative, 23% nodular and 18% micronodular. There was no difference in the growth fraction or proliferation pattern between horrifying and non horrifying tumours of similar growth pattern (P = ns), although infiltrative tumours in either group exhibited a significantly higher growth fraction than nodular tumours (P < 0.01). This suggests that there is no intrinsic biological difference between horrifying and non horrifying tumours to account for their behaviour. We conclude that late presentation, failed or inadequate early management especially of infiltrative tumours (and other subtypes) determines the development of horrifying tumours.
本研究比较了22例临床确诊的侵袭性基底细胞癌与81例非侵袭性病变的临床特征、组织学亚型、生长分数(通过Ki67免疫组化检测)和增殖模式。侵袭性肿瘤半数出现就诊延迟。另一半尽管早期进行了干预仍发展为侵袭性肿瘤。侵袭性肿瘤呈现多种组织学生长模式。其中50%为浸润性,23%为结节性,18%为微结节性。在生长模式相似的侵袭性和非侵袭性肿瘤之间,生长分数或增殖模式没有差异(P = 无统计学意义),尽管两组中的浸润性肿瘤均显示出比结节性肿瘤显著更高的生长分数(P < 0.01)。这表明侵袭性和非侵袭性肿瘤之间不存在内在生物学差异来解释它们的行为。我们得出结论,就诊延迟、早期治疗失败或不充分,尤其是对浸润性肿瘤(及其他亚型)的治疗,决定了侵袭性肿瘤的发生发展。